Mail Thread Index
- starship-design: -Highly Autonomous Systems,
Zenon Kulpa
- starship-design: FW: SSRT: Space Subcommittee authorizes another X-vehicle (fwd),
L. Parker
- starship-design: Fwd: No Subject,
KellySt
- starship-design: Emerging Possibilities for Space Propulsion Breakthroughs,
L. Parker
- starship-design: http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/PAO/warp.htm,
L. Parker
- starship-design: FW: SSRT: Space Access Update no. 71,
L. Parker
- starship-design: FW: SSRT: Space Access Update no. 71, part 2,
L. Parker
- starship-design: FW: SSRT: Space Access Update no. 72,
L. Parker
- starship-design: FW: SSRT: Space Access Update no. 72 Alert - Followup,
L. Parker
- starship-design: Tau Ceti, It and Planets,
kyle
- starship-design: To FTL or not to FTL, that is the question.,
kyle
- starship-design: We need habitats,
kyle
- starship-design: Habitat ideas,
kyle
- starship-design: http://www.seds.org/spaceviews/currentsv/index.html,
L. Parker
- starship-design: Homochirality,
Ken Wharton
- starship-design: Land or orbit,
kyle
- starship-design: Pointers to webpages,
kyle
- starship-design: What if...,
kyle
- starship-design: Fuel supplies and energy,
kyle
- starship-design: Zero point energy: Power source,
kyle
RE: starship-design: Zero point energy: Power source,
L. Parker
Re: starship-design: Zero point energy: Power source,
KellySt
starship-design: Atmosphere is necesary!,
kyle
starship-design: Ideas, thoughts, and speculation,
kyle
starship-design: just a note..,
Bakelaar
starship-design: Beanstalk,
kyle
starship-design: Re: Land or orbit,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: Re: Planetary Statistics,
KellySt
starship-design: FTL & ZPE Be more specific...,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: More Specific about FTL/ZPE,
kyle
starship-design: Aw, darnit!,
kyle
starship-design: Drive ideas, Re: My last message,
kyle
starship-design: Re: More Specific about FTL/ZPE,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: FTL Drive designs,
kyle
starship-design: ACCCKKPPPPTTHHH! Kevin, Not Genny,
Kevin \"Tex\" Houston
starship-design: Warping of space,
kyle
starship-design: Re: FTL Drive designs,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: Re: This and That.,
Ken Wharton
starship-design: 10^28,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: FTL, ZPE n' stuff,
kyle
starship-design: Re: FTL, ZPE n' stuff,
Ken Wharton
Re: starship-design: This and that.,
KellySt
starship-design: FTL drive designs,
kyle
starship-design: Avatar encounter,
kyle
starship-design: How much does this rig weigh?,
kyle
starship-design: Stars within 16 light years of the Sun ,
L. Parker
starship-design: Various things,
kyle
starship-design: Uh Oh, a problem,
kyle
Re: starship-design: Stars_within_16_light_years_of_the_Sun,
Zenon Kulpa
RE: starship-design: Stars_within_16_light_years_of_the_Sun,
Zenon Kulpa
RE: starship-design: Stars_within_16_light_years_of_the_Sun,
L. Parker
RE: starship-design: Stars_within_16_light_years_of_the_Sun,
L. Parker
starship-design: Re: Uh Oh, a problem,
KellySt
starship-design: Some Suggested Robotic Missions to Gliese 411 (Lalande 21185),
L. Parker
starship-design: Lalande 21185,
kyle
starship-design: http://www.empire.net/~whatmoug/Extrasolar/extrasolar_visions.html,
L. Parker
No Subject,
L. Parker
starship-design: Steve VanDevender,
kyle
starship-design: http://www.clark.net/pub/nyrath/hstars.gif,
L. Parker
starship-design: http://www.clark.net/pub/nyrath/closegal.gif,
L. Parker
starship-design: Possibly habitable stars within 100 parsecs,
L. Parker
starship-design: Go Starwisps,
Zenon Kulpa
<Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
- Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
KellySt
- RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
- Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
Zenon Kulpa
- Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
Timothy van der Linden
- Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
Antonio C T Rocha
- Re:starship-design: Go Starwisps,
Antonio C T Rocha
- RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
- Re: RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
KellySt
- Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
KellySt
- Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
KellySt
- RE: RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
- Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
Zenon Kulpa
- RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
Re: RE: RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
KellySt
Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
KellySt
RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
Re: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
Zenon Kulpa
RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
RE: starship-design: Go Starwisps,
L. Parker
starship-design: Fun With SpaceTime,
Ken Wharton
starship-design: More Fun with Spacetime,
Ken Wharton
starship-design: Re: Fun With SpaceTime,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: Missing letter or paradox?,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: More fun with Bright and Dwight,
L. Parker
starship-design: Constant 1 g Acceleration,
L. Parker
starship-design: Quantum Gravity,
L. Parker
starship-design: ZPF=inertia=gravity,
Kevin \"Tex\" Houston
starship-design: Relativity is not measurement-based,
Ken Wharton
starship-design: Re: Quantum Gravity,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: Increasingly less Fun with Spacetime,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: Even less Fun with Spacetime,
L. Parker
starship-design: THE QUANTUM'S PLIGHT,
L. Parker
starship-design: THE PHYSICISTS' BILL OF RIGHTS,
L. Parker
starship-design: Re: Even less Fun with Spacetime,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: Spacetime, Shmacetime,
Ken Wharton
starship-design: Re: Spacetime, Shmacetime,
Timothy van der Linden
starship-design: Book Recommendation,
L. Parker
starship-design: Cellular universe? Not!,
kyle
starship-design: http://newton.umsl.edu/infophys/a1examp2.html,
L. Parker
starship-design: Why go to the stars?,
kyle
starship-design: Re: Go Starwisps,
Timothy van der Linden
Mail converted by MHonArc
2.2.0