Table of Contents

Table	Table Title
Table 1	Overall satisfaction with job at UO
Table 2	Heard about the White Paper
Table 3	Read the White Paper
Table 4	Compensation should be raised to comparable universities
Table 5	Faculty should receive regular cost-of-living raises
Table 6	Faculty should be rewarded with merit increases
Table 7	Merit increases should not come at the expense of others
Table 8	Raises should go to those whose salaries are compressed
Table 9	Raises should go to those whose salaries are inequitable
Table 10	Raises should go to a majority of instructional faculty
Table 11	Across-the-board cost-of-living raises
Table 12	Merit increases based on faculty excellence
Table 13	Preferential increases to redress salary compression
Table 14	Preferential increases to redress other inequities
Table 15	Creating minimum salary floors by rank and department
Table 16	Most important criteria
Table 17	Second most important criteria
Table 18	Third most important criteria
Table 19	Year first began employment at UO
Table 20	School or college taught in
Table 21	Tenured tenure-track or not in a tenure related position
Table 22	Current academic rank
Table 23	Holds a concurrant administrative appointment
Table 24	Sex of respondent
Table 25	Race or ethnicity of respondent
Table 26	Returned Faculty Attitudes campus mail survey

---

[OSRL Main Page] [From the Director] [Services] [Projects] [Working Papers] [Banner Tables] [OSRL Staff] [Advisory Committee]