[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weekly newsletter
- To: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com, neill@foda.math.usu.edu, 101765.2200@compuserve.com, pbakelaar@exit109.com, mkshp@ionet.net
- Subject: Re: Weekly newsletter
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 19:25:59 +0100
To Kelly:
>>- Do you mean you don't want daily letters anymore?
>>- Do you still want daily letters but also a big letter at the week-end
>> composed of all the smaller letters?
>>- Do you still want daily letters but also at the end of the week some
>> handy summary/abstract of everything (useful) that has been discussed?
>
>Some people might want daily letter, some weekly collections. Both could
>be avalible to subscribers. The later would be filed on line for web
>access by cyber surfers.
So you are saying that YOU (who writes every day) actually would like to
read & reply all the letters once a week, instead of (y)our daily letters?
I'm amazed that you would say this or do you just mean that it is a great
idea for OTHERS to use?
Timothy
P.S. About summaries, it's needless to say that it is not the easiest and
most pleasant task.