[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: image maps
- To: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com, neill@foda.math.usu.edu, 101765.2200@compuserve.com
- Subject: RE: image maps
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Fri, 03 May 1996 13:35:39 +0100
>Client-side image maps are useful, as well. More efficient and faster, too.
> But not all browsers
>support them.
Not all browser support tables either, I suppose it will take half a year
before most people have netscape 2 or better. Since it will take a while
before the LIT site will become accessable to the public, I don't think
client-side imagemaps will be a problem.
I think that the IIS format is a bigger problem for us, MAPEDIT doesn't
support that it, and I assume that the Kelly's Mac program to make imagemaps
doesn't either.
Timothy