[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: image maps

I agree.  Besides the fact that client-side are also easier to maintain...
in the same
HTML file, and all...

David Levine, Application Engineer
InterWorld Technology Ventures, Inc.

>	T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl[SMTP:T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwen
>>Client-side image maps are useful, as well.  More efficient and faster,
>> But not all browsers
>>support them.
>Not all browser support tables either, I suppose it will take half a year
>before most people have netscape 2 or better. Since it will take a while
>before the LIT site will become accessable to the public, I don't think
>client-side imagemaps will be a problem.
>I think that the IIS format is a bigger problem for us, MAPEDIT doesn't
>support that it, and I assume that the Kelly's Mac program to make
>doesn't either.