[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: image maps
- To: "KellySt@aol.com" <KellySt@aol.com>, "kgstar@most.fw.hac.com" <kgstar@most.fw.hac.com>, "stevev@efn.org" <stevev@efn.org>, "jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu" <jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu>, "zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl" <zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl>, "hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu" <hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu>
- To: "rddesign@wolfenet.com" <rddesign@wolfenet.com>, "lparker@destin.gulfnet.com" <lparker@destin.gulfnet.com>, "DotarSojat@aol.com" <DotarSojat@aol.com>, "neill@foda.math.usu.edu" <neill@foda.math.usu.edu>, "101765.2200@compuserve.com" <101765.2200@compuserve.com>, "'T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl'" <T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl>
- Subject: RE: image maps
- From: David Levine <David@InterWorld.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 May 1996 12:13:37 -0400
I agree. Besides the fact that client-side are also easier to maintain...
in the same
HTML file, and all...
--
David Levine, Application Engineer
InterWorld Technology Ventures, Inc.
david@interworld.com
http://www.interworld.com/staff/david/
>----------
>From:
> T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl[SMTP:T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwen
>te.nl]
>
>>Client-side image maps are useful, as well. More efficient and faster,
>too.
>> But not all browsers
>>support them.
>
>Not all browser support tables either, I suppose it will take half a year
>before most people have netscape 2 or better. Since it will take a while
>before the LIT site will become accessable to the public, I don't think
>client-side imagemaps will be a problem.
>I think that the IIS format is a bigger problem for us, MAPEDIT doesn't
>support that it, and I assume that the Kelly's Mac program to make
>imagemaps
>doesn't either.
>