[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plasma mirror
- To: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com, neill@foda.math.usu.edu, 101765.2200@compuserve.com, MLEN3097@Mercury.GC.PeachNet.EDU
- Subject: Re: Plasma mirror
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 00:47:32 +0100
Kelly replied:
>>I assume this is a stationary plasma field, that is kept at the ship. --
>
>On the ship yes, stationary no. It is used as the moving reflector that
>sweeps the beem back and forth. The artical mentioned it can re-aim in 10
>milisec. (I think.)
I meant the latter, so far I think I understand.
>>- How fast would such a sheet render useless after the power has been cut off?
>
>Almost as fast as it can be reaimed I'ld guess.
One other question that I'm thinking of, how fast can it be recreated from
"scratch". I could imagine that it is blown away faster than it can be build.
(We cannot just turn off the maser beam, waiting for the ion-mirror to be
created.)
>I was thinking the ions would be blown out of the plasma sheet as they
>interact with the beam. Since the beam presure would be far greater than
>the holding magnetic fields
I guess a "soft" attachment to the starship could work
>>Yes, are you clearvoyant?
>What can I say. Great minds think alike.
Am I sorry I asked.... ;))
Timothy