[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OK, here the right calculus (I hope)
- To: hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl
- Subject: Re: OK, here the right calculus (I hope)
- From: KellySt@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 15:12:11 -0500
- cc: kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@interworld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com
Kevin
> If it's not too much trouble, can you figure this for
> a constant maser beam How much extra RM will we need?
> A decreasing maser beam is possible, it's only a time
> delay calculation, but a constant beam would solve
> some engineering problems
Don't wory. Most of the beam wount hit the sail/collector anyway. If you
want less beam, furl in the sail a little.
Kelly