[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Programming
- To: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, bmansur@oc.edu, DotarSojat@aol.com
- Subject: Re: Programming
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:35:18 +0100
To Kelly,
>>Microsoft DOS always included some form of BASIC with its operating system,
>>doesn't the Mac have something similar?
>
>They have scripting functions and a ton of extra systems extensions and
>utility programs, but not a programing languge. Apple assumed most of
>their customers would not be developers. So a free programing language
>wouldn't be of much interest.
>
>Though I suppose I could plug the equations into the 3d graphing utility
>they hand out? Humm.
Well, Windows doesn't have a standard programming utility either.
Probably the userfriendlyness means no programming allowed.
Timothy