
THE HISTORICAL TAXONOMY CAN BE THOUGHT OF AS A SCHEMATIC "POLITICAL ECONOMY"
THE HISTORICAL TAXONOMY IS A MOBILE, EVEN KALEIDOSCOPIC, BEAST
This suggestive organizational TAXONOMY is dynamic with respect to the interior relationships up and down the deceptively stiff-looking outline. The taxonomic categories are themselves fluid and intertwined with one another. Remember these cautionary and suggestive words about "taxonomies".
For example, sometimes it appears that everyday life decides the way people think, while at others it appears that the way people think determines their daily life. Arguments about crime and poverty, for example, often hang on this point. Criminality and poverty are thought by some to be created by circumstances of everyday life. Others think criminality and poverty are created by character traits of the criminals and the poor themselves, and therefore everyday life circumstances of criminals or dangerous classes of people follow from the way they think or are the result of character traits.
Historians might often consider each possibility, and they also like to ask if these situations are the same for all people, up and down the social hierarchy, or in many different places over the globe, or in all periods of historical time.
Of course, there is change over historical time. Chronology works as if our seemingly stable TAXONOMY rolled constantly to the right. Nothing is fixed, up and down the four sections or from geographic place to place, and now we are reminded of the horizontal movement of the whole loose structure over time.
Furthermore, we notice in the record of historical experience that various sections and subsections of the taxonomy above seem to roll forward in time at widely different and irregular speeds. Some aspects of human experience seem to change quickly, then not at all, then very slowly, while others seem never to change. We sometimes detect "retrograde motion". Clothing styles, technology, etc., seem very fluid, while certain basic values seem stable. Is there really a significant history of "murder"? of the emotion "love"? Yet the changing and the apparently changeless dimensions of historical experience are all intertwined. And the whole package is unquestionably rolling forward in time. Such is the four dimensional kaleidoscope of history.
But what sets this squirming kaleidoscope in motion? LOOP back to webpage "Interests"
![]()
ALTERNATE + RIGHT ARROW TO RETURN TO WHERE YOU CAME FROM
|
|
|
|
|
|