[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: starship-design: HOTOL SeaDragon idea.



 

 KellySt@aol.com wrote:

From: KellySt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 19:00:03 EST
Subject: Re: starship-design: HOTOL SeaDragon idea.
To: bfranchuk@jetnet.ab.ca, starship-design@lists.uoregon.edu


In a message dated 12/3/02 9:31:56 PM, bfranchuk@jetnet.ab.ca writes:

>KellySt@aol.com wrote:
>> Good point about the politics. Course you could simply flag it out of
>
>> another country that doesn't worry about such things. Or get a powerfull
>
>> enough backer to ignor the Eco-nuts.
>>
>> Certainly nuclear power is critical if we ae to do any deep space stuff.
>
>> Even manmed flights to Mars would be far to risky and dificult without
>nukes.
>> So if you can't get nukes, you can't do space.
>
>Anti-matter is the only way to go once in orbit.
>http://www.transorbital.net/Library/D001_S01.html
>Also I think with cheap solar power from space
>the cost could be resonable.


To dangerous and unstable. I doubt it would be competative with fusion.

gentlemen:

two words: gravity control

Keep looking up,

Curtis



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now