In a message dated 10/30/98 2:27:48 PM, KELLY_STARKS@udlp.com wrote: >Lee, >I read the space study, and the only thing that follows your statement of "space >resource mining becomes practical at $100 a pound to LEO" is the He3 mining >section. I.E. lunar He3 could be cost competative to current electric >productino fuels at about $100 launch costs. (Of course that assumes you have >a >He3 burning reactor.) > >Is that what you were refering to? > >Kelly
---- End included message ----
- To: kellyst@aol.com
- Subject: space study
- From: KELLY_STARKS@udlp.com
- Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:26:52 -0600
Lee, I read the space study, and the only thing that follows your statement of "space resource mining becomes practical at $100 a pound to LEO" is the He3 mining section. I.E. lunar He3 could be cost competative to current electric productino fuels at about $100 launch costs. (Of course that assumes you have a He3 burning reactor.) Is that what you were refering to? Kelly