[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weekly newsletter
- To: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden), KellySt@aol.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, David@InterWorld.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, DotarSojat@aol.com, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Weekly newsletter
- From: Philip Bakelaar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 18:41:00 -0400
At 02:05 PM 7/25/96 +0100, Timothy van der Linden wrote:
>>> I also REALLY like the idea of also getting a
>>> multi-letter digest weekly. We do cover so
>>> much, and even now, I can't remember all that
>>> we (well, actually, *you*, not me) have
>>> talked about in the last 2 days (50 letters!)
>>We really need to get the newsletter system settled out. And start archiving
>>stuff. I also think the weekly digest is a great idea!
>Please help me out here, I'm not sure what both of you (and others) mean
>with a "weekly digest".
>- Do you mean you don't want daily letters anymore?
>- Do you still want daily letters but also a big letter at the week-end
> composed of all the smaller letters?
>- Do you still want daily letters but also at the end of the week some
> handy summary/abstract of everything (useful) that has been discussed?
I meant that I wanted daily letters AS WELL AS a weekly summary of ALL
the letters, so summaries.. I don't know how other people feel about it,
but that way whoever wants to can just delete all their mail for the
week and save the one weekly one.. I mean, I already have like 200-300
letters from you guys, but it could be compressed (weekly) into I
guess 4 or 5 letters. Saves no space, but relieves the clutter.
Thats IMHO. :)