[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: minor stuff...
- To: zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl (Zenon Kulpa)
- Subject: RE: minor stuff...
- From: Steve VanDevender <stevev@efn.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:22:26 -0700
- Cc: KellySt@aol.com, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@ippt.gov.pl, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@interworld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com, sl0c8@cc.usu.edu, 101765.2200@compuserve.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, neill@foda.math.usu.edu, pbakelaar@exit109.com, mkshp@ionet.net
- In-Reply-To: <9607251737.AA07495@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl>
- References: <9607251737.AA07495@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl>
Zenon Kulpa writes:
> > From David@InterWorld.com Thu Jul 25 19:02:28 1996
> >
> > >I think the main question in my mind is what you want to call the
> > >mailing list. I've proposed "mini-lit" and "starship-design", or we
> > >could have a (hopefully brief) proposal and voting process.
> >
> > starship-design sounds fine to me - probably to Kelly, too, as we know
> > he doesn't like "lit"...
> >
> Ahh, but what abot LIT having also Marine, Near Earth,
> and Solar System Development sections?
> Should they maintain separate mailing lists?
I will immediately state that my offer is to manage a list specifically
for the Starship Design group that has been mailing each other with big
CC: lines for the past several months. At the very least I only want to
maintain one list, although if we want to slightly expand the topic of
that list to cover those other areas that would be fine with me.