[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RE:
- To: Rex & Timothy <Lessa@worldnet.att.net>, KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com, neill@foda.math.usu.edu, 101765.2200@compuserve.com, T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl
- Subject: Re: RE:
- From: Philip Bakelaar <pbakelaar@exit109.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 22:04:58 -0400
At 01:30 AM 7/16/96 GMT, Rex & Timothy wrote:
>Kelly wrote:
>
>>P.S.
>>By the way. If someone wants to try to write up Tims relatavistic
>>calculations as CGI aps that would be usefull.
>
>Kelly why don't you just get a browser that supports Javascript?
>
>I'm not sure if I like others to fumble with my creations, I'd need to be
>sure they would be working correct and that I was able to change things.
>Remember that if something is wrong or does not work, that people will come
>to me asking for help (or complaining). Since only few sites allow
>CGI-scripting, the possibilities for me to maintain anything like that are
>small. If I'm right Dave's computer doesn't allow them, am I right there
>David? (I didn't try it yet)
>
>I won't force people getting newer browsers, and usually try to make
>everything accessable for older browsers, but I think if people want more,
>they should also do a little effort themselves in getting it.
>I wonder how non-fill-out-form-browsers are able to sent some output to a
>server to get back the answer. Well I could imagine that one would type an
>URL with ?+5+and+zoom at the end, but that wouldn't make things easier.
>So are CGI-scripts a solution here? Should I add ASCII-images because maybe
>some browser don't show gif or jpg-images?
>Really, in one year every browser has Java-script in it.
>
>Timothy
Very, very good point, Tim! :)