[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Laser Aperture Size
- To: KellySt@aol.com
- Subject: Re: Laser Aperture Size
- From: "L. Parker" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 21:03:07 -0600
- Cc: David <David@InterWorld.com>, hous0042 <email@example.com>, KellySt <KellySt@aol.com>, rddesign <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Steve VanDevender <email@example.com>, "T.L.G.vanderLinden" <T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, DotarSojat@aol.com
At 12:42 AM 3/15/96 -0500, you wrote:
>But if the Lorenz turning would take 4 times as much power, and you can't
>stay on the beam (or on course) to do it. Does it help any?
Probably not, but it is an alternative to consider.
+ Weave a circle 'round him thrice, and close your eyes with holy dread... +