[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another new? idea
- To: KellySt@aol.com, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, David@InterWorld.com, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Another new? idea
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 16:33:23 +0100
>I wasn't offended. I just thought you had lost it in the avalance, and then
>half remembered it and thought you came up with it.
Yes, I wasn't sure anymore, in fact I started writing it after the first
letter I read, after reading more and more letters, I started realizing that
you guys had similar thoughts.
>> >Your talking about some heavy power equipment, but you've eliminated the
>> >almost impossible problem of cleanly reflecting the beam.
>> No, I wasn't reflecting it, I was retransmitting it by using maser-beams.
>Note: I said "eliminated the almost impossible problem of cleanly reflecting
>the beam". I.E. you're not reflecting it.
>I think your snow blind from the E-mail avalanch. ;)
Yes, I think so :) Warn me again if I'm at the edge of a cliff...
>I wasn't thinking of it for here. Sorry for confusion. I'm still woundering
>if their is some better way to use the beam to decel.
sO AM i (iS MY caps-LOCK ON?)
>>>I was woundering if we could focus the beam on a reaction mass for some
>>>kind of plasm brake or something. But can't remember the equations that
>>>were geting thrown about.
>> I didn't understand what you want to have, could you restate it?
>Powe in watts to thrust equation if you have it.
You mean E=0.5 M v^2 and Power=E/t ?