Some Procedures in Argument (from Barnet and Bedau)
(Summarized/Paraphrased from Chapter 3)

DEFINITION:  Answers the question, “What is it?” to “find, clarify, and develop ideas” (78).
Definition by synonym:  a word that roughly means the same thing (although no two words are exactly alike).
Definition by example:  showing what the thing being defined is.
Definition by stipulation:  you limit the definition to your understanding of the term—the term is defined by your statement of what it means.
Definition by stating the essence:  what is the essence of the thing being defined?  Example:  man is “'a rational animal'” (82).
Definition by using sufficient and necessary conditions:  the definition is stated in “if and only if” form and is true.

ASSUMPTIONS:  “One or more unexamined beliefs” (83)—may be stated (explicit) or unstated (implicit, tacit).

PREMISES:  “Stated assumptions used as reasons” (84).

SYLLOGISM:  “Joining two premises [ . . . ] to produce a conclusion" (84).

DEDUCTION:  Moving mentally from one statement to another—the reasons or premises offered contain the conclusion within themselves.
Enthymeme:  an abbreviated syllogism—contains one of the syllogism’s two premises and the conclusion.
Sound argument:  all the premises of the syllogism must be true and the syllogism must be valid; that is, the conclusion follows from the premises.  If the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true.
Unsound argument:  one or both of the premises is not true or even if they are both true, they don’t lead to the conclusion.

INDUCTION:  “Uses information about observed cases to reach a conclusion about unobserved cases” (89).
Generalization:  based on observation that a certain result of an action occurs again and again, so we assume that result will happen the next time that action occurs.
Counterexamples:   if situations can be found where that same action does not produce the same result, your example counters the generalization.

EVIDENCE:
Experimentation:  “deliberately contrived situations [ . . . ] designed to yield particular observations” (90).
Examples:  samples.

Real Events:  things that have actually happened.  Real events may not offer “adequate or relevant evidence” because of their historical circumstances.
Artificial or hypothetical cases (invented instances):  “admittedly false, but by virtue of its simplification it sets forth the relevant details very clearly” (92).  The drawback is that these are not evidence, but illustrations.
Analogy:  a comparison that “asserts that things that are alike in some ways are alike in yet another way” (93).  B&B point out, though, that “analogies do not necessarily prove anything” (94), because the conclusion drawn rests on the point being argued.

Authoritative testimony:  citing/quoting experts on the issue.
Statistics:  quantitative or statistical evidence, including graphs, tables, and numbers.

NONRATIONAL APPEALS:
Satire:  “witty ridicule” (100)
Verbal irony:  “contrasts what is said and what is meant” (100)
Sarcasm:  verbal irony that is “heavy-handed” (100)
Humor:  should not be mere wisecracking or clownish
Emotional appeals:  attempts to arouse a reader’s emotion in response to an issue, such as pity or fear.

 

Last Updated 02/14/08