|   The term “baby farming” 
              was common in late nineteenth and early twentieth century cities 
              but by 1920 or so most states had taken action against the commercial 
              practices it suggested and the term was on the decline. It referred 
              to placing-out infants for money as 
              well as to their sale for profit. Many clients were unwed mothers, 
              prostitutes, and destitute or deserted wives who needed help with 
              their children while they worked for wages. Although most baby farming 
              amounted to what we now call family day care, it developed a terrible 
              reputation when exposes uncovered horrific abuses and horrible death 
              traps. Stories about baby farming in newspapers and magazines were 
              reported in lurid detail that called upon crude gender, racial, 
              ethnic, and class stereotypes. These scandals helped to mobilize 
              political support for child welfare regulation, including minimum 
              standards such as state licensing, certification of child-placers, 
              and investigation of foster homes. 
            Baby farming was condemned for being lethal, profitable, and at 
              odds with child welfare. At a time 
              when public health reformers documented astronomical rates of infant 
              mortality in poor, congested urban communities and congregate institutions, 
              it came as no surprise that babies consigned to farms often died 
              there, victims of epidemic disease and unsanitary conditions. The 
              entrepreneurial side of baby farming was also used to vilify extreme 
              forms of commercial adoption, in which babies were bought and sold 
              like other commodities. Baby farmers sometimes profited on both 
              ends of the adoption transaction, first extracting fees from desperate 
              birth mothers and then demanding large sums from adopters. A survey 
              by the Chicago Juvenile Protective Association reported that children 
              were sold for up to $100 in the 1910s, with a percentage down and 
              the balance in installments. No questions were asked and children 
              were frequently sent out of state. One brash Chicago farmer even 
              used the slogan: “Its cheaper and easier to buy a baby 
              for $100.00 than to have one of your own.” 
            Maternity homes and lying-in hospitals where doctors and midwives 
              worked as for-profit adoption brokers were, like baby farms, an 
              important part of the commercial adoption scene. Newspaper advertising 
              was the primary technique they used to reach potential customers 
              and suppliers. “For Adoption at Birth, Full Surrender, 
              No Questions Asked.” In several cities, early adoption reformers 
              investigated adoption ads. Campaigns to eradicate the marketing 
              strategies common in commercial adoption were a primary means of 
              eradicating black market adoptions themselves. 
             |