|    This immediate 
              response to the tragic crash of an “Operation Babylift” 
              transport plane on April 4, 1975 can be understood as part of the 
              controversial debate about that particular “rescue” 
              effort. The crash, which occurred shortly after take-off from Saigon, 
              killed more than 100 children, along with at least 25 of their adult 
              escorts. The statement also suggests that opinions about Vietnamese 
              children were inextricable from views of the Vietnam war. It made 
              a number of points that have been repeated by critics of both international 
              adoptions and U.S. foreign policy throughout the post-Vietnam 
              era. For additional views, see Gloria Emerson, 
              “Operation Babylift,” the New 
              York Times ad about Operation Babylift, and Agency 
              for International Development, Operation Babylift Report, 1975. 
             We, the undersigned professors of ethics and religion, strongly 
              denounce the actions of President Ford and the private organizations, 
              such as World Airways, for their planned airlifting of 2000 displaced 
              Vietnamese children to the United States. Even though they may be 
              motivated by good intentions, the airlift, we believe, is immoral, 
              for the following reasons: 
            1. Many of the children are not orphans; their parents or relatives 
              may still be alive, although displaced, in Vietnam. 
            2. The children will be well taken care of, even if the Thieu regime 
              collapses, as they are already in North Vietnam and in NLF held 
              areas of South Vietnam. 
            3. The children would be happier growing up in Vietnam with Vietnamese, 
              rather than in America with Caucasians. 
            4. The only reason for bringing the children here is to salve our 
              conscience, and children should not be used that way. 
            The war in Vietnam is a moral issue, and the ending of the war 
              is a moral issue. The attitude that “we know best how to help 
              them,” is the same attitude that sustained our immoral involvement 
              in Vietnam for so many years. The Vietnamese children should be 
              allowed to stay in Vietnam where they belong. 
            Professor Mark Juergensmeyer, Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley 
              Professor Robert McAfee Brown, Stanford University, Stanford 
              Professor Charles McCoy, Pacific School of Religion, Berkeley 
              Professor John Coleman, S.J. Jesuit School of Theology, Berkeley 
              Professor John Bennett, Pacific School of Religion, former President, 
              Union Theological Seminary, New York 
              Professor Davie Napier, President of Pacific School of Religion, 
              Berkeley 
             |