|    Gloria Emerson, 
              whose book on Vietnam, Winners and Losers, won the National 
              Book Award for non-fiction in 1978, offers a sharply critical view 
              of “Operation Babylift” in this excerpt. The effort 
              to “rescue” thousands of Vietnamese children on the 
              eve of the U.S. evacuation was mounted by a number of U.S.-based 
              agencies and organizations, including Holt 
              Children’s Services, the Pearl 
              Buck Foundation, World Vision, and the International Social 
              Service. It was widely publicized and hotly debated after a military 
              transport plane carrying around 300 passengers crashed on April 
              4, 1975, shortly after take-off from Saigon. More than 100 children 
              were killed, along with at least 25 of their adult escorts. For 
              other views of “Operation Babylift,” see the text of 
              the New York Times ad that 
              ran on April 7, 1975, the “Statement 
              on the Immorality of Bringing South Vietnamese Orphans to the United 
              States, April 4, 1975,” and Agency 
              for International Development, Operation Babylift Report, 1975. 
            Operation babylift became a carnival: tearful, 
              middle-class white women squeezing and kissing dark-eyed children, 
              telling reporters that their new names would be Phyllis and Wendy 
              and David. It is not over yet. A spokesperson for AID, the government 
              agency providing military aircraft for the private agencies bringing 
              the children here, and said it was an “open-ended operation.” 
              The arrival of nearly 2000 children from Vietnam—I won’t 
              call them orphans since we now know that some of them did indeed 
              have parents—has aroused some of the emotions felt in 1973 
              when the American prisoners of war came home at last. Many people, 
              so moved and so grateful, forgot that if the United States had not 
              gone on bombing there would have been no prisoners. This time, only 
              two years later, there is the same self-congratulatory spirit, a 
              feeling of winning something at last, the need to prove to ourselves 
              what decent people we really are. It is almost forgotten during 
              these excited, evangelical scenes at airports that it is this country 
              that made so many Vietnamese into orphans, that destroyed villages 
              ripping families apart, this country that sent young Vietnamese 
              fathers to their deaths. Now we have decided the Vietnamese we will 
              “save” and “love” must be very pliant, very 
              helpless. . . . 
             Now the welfare of a few thousand children has 
              become a most successful propaganda effort for us to defend and 
              support the diseased government of Nguyen Van Thieu despite the 
              opposition to him in the South. Babies are a nicer story than the 
              26 million craters we gave South Vietnam, nicer than the 100,000 
              amputees in that wretched country, more fun to read about than the 
              14 million acres of defoliated forest and the 800,000 acres that 
              we bulldozed. It does not matter at all that on television a Vietnamese 
              foster mother sobbed bitterly and strained for a last look at the 
              child she had cared for as Vietnamese infants were put on a plane 
              at Tan Son Nhut. There are clearly no attempts being made to find 
              foster parents in Vietnam who could take a child; we do not want 
              to give money for that. . . . 
             Vietnamese living in the United States have tried 
              to reason that all children in their country must be helped and 
              this can best be done by ending the war. The first step would be 
              to stop sustaining the government of Thieu. “You have been 
              killing us with your kindness for twenty years,” Le Anh Tu, 
              a 26-year-old Vietnamese woman living in Philadelphia, says. On 
              a recent local radio talk show, called the “Saturday Night 
              Special,” she asked listeners in favor of adoption if they 
              really cared for the welfare of Vietnamese children, if they would 
              be willing to return the children once peace came. The answers were 
              shocked refusals at such an idea. . . . 
            We will never have the happy ending we want. President 
              Ford’s chief refugee coordinator, Daniel Parker, the administrator 
              of AID, suggested at a congressional hearing that 3000 to 4000 more 
              Vietnamese children be airlifted to the United States. The confusion 
              is immense. The argument grows a little louder, but not loud enough. 
            On the day of the crash of the U.S. C-5A transport 
              plane carrying 243 children and 43 accompanying adults, a South 
              Vietnamese army lieutenant spoke his mind. “It is nice to 
              see you Americans taking home souvenirs of our country as you leave–china 
              elephants and orphans,” this officer said. “Too bad 
              some of them broke today, but we have plenty more.” 
             
             |