|   Joseph Reid, 
              the Executive Director of the Child 
              Welfare League of America, wrote the following letter of protest 
              to the editor of the Woman’s Home Companion after 
              Pearl Buck’s “The Children Waiting: 
              The Shocking Scandal of Adoption” appeared in the September 
              1955 issue of that magazine.  
             Dear Mr. Smith: 
            Miss Buck’s article contains many statements which are inaccurate 
              and grossly misleading. We request, therefore, that this letter 
              be printed in a forthcoming issue [of the Woman’s Home 
              Companion] to correct certain misstatements which, if accepted 
              by your readers, would result in harm to the welfare of children. . . . 
             The article as at best not factual and at worst verges on the 
              slanderous. The general impression is that child welfare agencies 
              for a variety of unsupported reasons are refusing to make available 
              children who are clamoring for adoption. This is not true. 
             The following are paraphrases of some of the assertions made by 
              Miss Buck which we believe to be in serious error, together with 
              our presentation of the facts as we know them. 
             1) “Most children in institutions could be made available 
              for adoption. Their parents have abandoned them.” 
            REPLY: There are about 100,000 children in institutions. Less than 
              3 per cent are full orphans. Others have at least one living parent. 
              Over half of all children in institutions are returned to their 
              own homes after an average stay of 1.7 years away. . . . 
              Research studies have indicated that from 12 to 18 per cent of older 
              children in foster care can be made available for adoption if adoption 
              agencies were able to untangle the legal barriers which now hold 
              them and could find homes for them. These children constitute a 
              real and tragic problem, but the article seriously distorts the 
              facts by leading readers to believe that all of the children could 
              be placed and that institutions are not needed. . . . 
            2) ”Orphanages are maintained to supply jobs for staff. Institutions 
              keep children for selfish motives.” 
            REPLY: . . . A nation-wide study reveals 15 jobs 
              for every trained social worker in the country. It is nonsense to 
              state that children are being retained in institutions merely to 
              supply jobs for staff. Social workers can have their pick of a variety 
              of positions in their field. 
             3) “Religion is the strongest force in keeping children 
              from being adopted.” 
            REPLY: Many states have legislation requiring that children be 
              placed in homes of their own religious faith. Regardless of the 
              merit of such laws, they do not prevent children from being adopted. 
              Our estimates show that at least six Catholic families apply for 
              each Catholic child available for adoption; ten Protestant families 
              seek each Protestant child; and there are even more Jewish families 
              for every adoptable Jewish child. . . . The only 
              exception to this statement applies to non-white children. There 
              is an extreme shortages of adoptive homes for non-white children 
              of all faiths. . . . 
            The basic problem in present child welfare practices is not venality 
              or selfishness. It is public apathy, lack of funds, and lack of 
              public understanding. . . . The nation’s child 
              care programs reflect what the public is willing to pay for. It 
              is misleading to talk about this problem without discussing costs. 
              Good child care is not cheap. Those who know the nature of the problem 
              must be determined and outspoken about it. . . . 
              Name calling is not the answer. 
            Sincerely yours, 
            Joseph H. Reid 
              Executive Director, Child Welfare League of America 
             |