[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: starship-design: Space Elevators Maybe Closer To Reality ThanImagined



On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 20:21, KellySt@aol.com wrote:
Hard to say.  Current tech with a large market could drop costs to $s per 
pound of cargo to orbit.  A teather might be cheaper -- or might be more 
expensive.  A teathers overhead and maint expenses could well be far more.

Teather advocates love to quote the stats that "energy costs" to orbit would 
only be pennies per pound of cargo.  But the energy costs of conventional 
launchers is little more -- and a trivial fraction of actual costs.
Actually, dumping energy seemed to be a bigger deal than energy cost to orbit. Perhaps they could anchor it somewhere like the middle of Africa which REALLY could use cheap energy and sell the energy surplust to defray operating costs.

Better, of course, would be to do the same thing somewhere in the developed world where they could get more money for the same energy.

Lee

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part