[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: starship-design: AsterAnts
Curtis Manges writes:
> > ... Oh wait, their is no launch cost for water. Its just caried along on
> > shuttle flights to carry crew or other suplies. The extra weight isn't
> > significant, and causes no real increse in shuttle costs.
>
> Excuse me?? I thought _everything_ had a launch cost. And the weight
> _is_ significant, about 60 lb/cubic foot.
I have this vague memory that a lot of the water they use on shuttle
flights is produced as by the fuel cells they use to generate power. So
in a sense they may be getting their water for free; the money was spent
on launching the fuel.
Note that the per-pound launch costs quoted for payload are typically
calculated by dividing the cost of flying an entire shuttle mission by
the weight of the payload. Water carried for crew use _isn't_ payload
and therefore won't have much effect on the payload launch cost.
The cost per pound to put the entire shuttle in orbit is quite a bit
less than the payload launch cost; the payload is only a fraction of the
entire shuttle weight.