Re: starship-design: Re: Inspiration attached!

[STAR1SHIP@aol.com]

n a message dated 2/12/02 1:15:07 PM Pacific Standard Time, stevev@efn.org 
writes:

<< STAR1SHIP@aol.com writes:
  > OPPS, made a math error in travel time I gave for the sturdy C ship 
craft. in 
  > previous post. Why did someone in group not catch my error?.
 
 Probably because your rambling posts are so full of errors, hand-waving,
 and wishful thinking that reading them, let alone proofreading them, is
 a pointless task.
  >>

Steve,

Your jealosy is showing cause LIT has failed to produce "one" practical star 
ship design.
 
Einstein didn't leave anyone "King of Physics" when he passed, so stop acting
like it was Visser,  Misner, Thorne,  Wheeler or you as Einstein was
condisidered the
leading authority on relativity till he died. 
 
I am Tom, the next best thing. Einstein left signed instructions(lost) in 1955
to be
given to children on how to continue his work as It was up to the children
reading his instructions as he was censored from publishing to the general
public his work in atomic physics. He claimed it was he who invented the 
atomic
bombs in 1913 that exploded on Japan in 1945 and his complete plans were 
stolen
by Enrico Fermi in 1938 with trickery. I followed those instructions when I
read them as a child in 1963 and continue to this day. So Einstein did leave a
very clear legacy and line of authority for future physists, so any not 
knowing
his atomic physics as he taught it, including yourself, simply has no
credibility even today.
 
Some other of Einstein's "lost" works
Einstein fondly recalled by area woman
<A HREF="http://www.sunone.com/news/articles/12-28-99h.shtml";>
http://www.sunone.com/news/articles/12-28-99h.shtml</A>
 
You may quote me Thomas H. Jackson and reference above. 


I make no attempt to acclerate a particle from a particle accelerater to C + V
velocites.

We are not discussing max velocity of tricycles, horses or  particles fired
from a particle accelerator that relativistic(relative to the acclerator base)
mass tends towards infinity as relativistic velocity appraches C. That would
require an energy delivered from the base frame reference tend towards 
infinity
to change the velocity of the relativistic mass, so limits particle
accelerators to sub light speed.

 We are discussing a rocket machine that delivers a energy to a mass, by
converting part of the moving relativistic mass to the relativitic energy
tending towards infinity to change the velocity of the mass to beyond C. 

I only need to convert a small part of the exhaust mass to energy.
 
I rely on momentum to carry the rocket beyond c.
I conserve momentum as momenum(P) = MV and as each action has an equal and
opposite reaction, In a rocket(r) the momentum of the rocket in one direction
is always = to the momentum of the exhaust(e) in the other direction at any
given time.
is expressed in a general equation as MrVr=MeVe conserving momentum.
 
Example.
A 100 ton ship accelerates at one g by providing the energy from converting 
1/2
tons of 95 tons exhaust to the energy required to accelerate the 94.5 tons of
exhaust out the exhaust port at 1/10 c. This exhaust momentum propels the
remaining 5 ton ship to 1.89 C speed in the opposite direction.
 
See
MrVr=MeVe 
5 tons times Mr = 94.5 tons times 1/10 C
.945C /5 = 1.89C
As 1/2 ton mass converts to energy it leaves the exhaust mass so the figure of
95 tons changes to 94.5 tons giving a rocket velocity of 1.89 C conserving
momentum. 

For animation working diagram of engine see:
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/tjac780754/Page1.html";>
http://members.aol.com/tjac780754/Page1.html</A>

The engine consists of two parts 1 exhaust(e) and 2 rocket(r) only, as
momentum(P) is equal to Mass(M) times Velocity(V) then in a reaction engine 
for
each action there is a equal and opposite reaction conserving momentum
(Newton's First Law expressed mathematicly as MeVe=MrVr as the momentum of the
rocket in one direction is alway equal to the momentum of the exhaust in the
other direction at any point in time any where in the universe so is 
considered
a Universal Law.
 
Jesus Christ or Anoksunamen must obey the Universal Law and if they ascended 
to
the heavens in a 1 g rocket then they can easily return alive today obeying
Einstein's relativity laws.
 
So behave and obey the law cause they might be ticked off when they return.
 :-O

Do not ask "What is time" again. Look at mass of clock hand moving around 
clock
face circumfrance to determine "What is time?"
The physical quantity of time(t) is defined as the fourth dimension(d) in
Einstein mechanics representing 4d space and time in graphic detail by the t 
in
the math coordinate system where  x,y,z and t  represent the known three
spatial dimensions of height, width, depth and the fourth dimension time.
Time does not exist without mass moving over a distance. All "real world
physics" of mass motion in space and time can be described completely with 
this
coordinate system in third degree equations represented by equations with 
whole
number exponents 0,1,2, and 3 representing the 4 dimensions.
Quantum mechanics uses equations with higher than 3 exponets beginning with 4
exponet representing 5 dimensions so fourth or higher degree equations is
defined as fantasy world physics, and the mechanics are trapped in the
imagination dimension of infinite dimensions and possiblilites.
Einstien defined quantum mechanics as "mathamatical gobbley gook" as
imagination has use in physics but must be trained and disciplined by 
knowledge
of the laws of real world physics in 4 dimensions.
I agree.

Tom