[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: starship-design: unknown force



In a message dated 5/16/01 5:27:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time, stevev@efn.org
writes:


Ben Franchuk writes:
> try autodynamics to explain the gravity problem.
> http://www.autodynamics.org/

As far as I can tell autodynamics is run-of-the mill kook physics.  If
you think it really explains this situation, perhaps you'd like to run
the numbers and show whether it really does explain the discrepancy.





Gee Steve. Why don't you tell us how you really feel :-) I do not agree with
Ben and auto dynamics but they do seem to be more on the ball than the
traditional old fashion theories you spout ad naseaum. By the way, how are
you coming on competing the incomplete Bohr atom model and adding a
gravitational component and explaining how your theory violates universal law
of like charges repel and yet remain taught today as a valid theory.

Examiners of new theories are of three minds. 1 Skeptic, 2. Objective, 3 Open
minded.  I discard skeptics as they take the lazy position and will not take
the burden of proof supporting their opinion, and I discard the open minded
as the last person that wanted me to be open minded wanted to dance with my
wife, seems many have the neurotic view to do as the Romans do. Objective
examination required of new knowledge means that you own teachings are
examined with the same diligence that the new knowledge is. That your beliefs
are widely taught and published is not proof of validly. Take you own
medicine and explain the gravitational anomaly observed.

Tom

Atomic Rocket and atomic bomb designs of Tom Jackson
My stuff has * prefix
*Star Ship Number 1- Bio info
http://hometown.aol.com/star1ship/myhomepage/index.html
* Transporter Room (Table of site contents)
http://members.aol.com/tjac780754/index.htm#TRANSPORT
*A Definitive Analysis of Atomic Power- Applied physics
http://members.aol.com/tjac780754/indexda.htm
* Plasma Rocket Engine- Patent Pending
http://members.aol.com/tjac780754/indexb.htm

Other Public domain sites related to atomic bomb and rocket designing
Summary of Critical Accidents in USAEC, 1945-1970
http://nuketesting.enviroweb.org/accident/critical.htm
 Shows the experiment methodology to measure the critical mass of
radioactive metal disks, cylinder or spheres by stacking 1/2 cubes and
1/2*1/2*1" shapes in rough disk, cylinder or sphere shape by using inert
plastic cubes for support and ease of disassembly to find the chosen shapes
melting point coined critical mass as a function of isotope, mass and shape.  

The Radioactive Boy Scout
 http://www.dangerouslaboratories.org/radscout.html
 How to build working breeder reactor to make bomb grade material from
 public available sources

The Manhattan Project
http://www.enviroweb.org/issues/nuketesting/hew/Usa/Med/Med.html
 No bomb designing here just theoretical physics speculation and released
misinformation that can be waded through for the few facts

Documentation and Diagrams of the Atomic Bomb
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/more/atomic.htm
 Outlaw labs public domain design with
 more speculation in theoretical physics based on chain reaction theory

Nuclear Weapon Diagrams
http://sun00781.dn.net/nuke/hew/Library/Brown/
  Good list and graphics of theoretical proposed designs from Manhattan
project based on chain reaction theory

Building the Bomb on a Budget
http://www.cantrip.org/bomb.html
    To keep your sense of humor

How to Make an H-bomb
http://www.infinet.com/~dionisio/fun/make-your-own-h-bomb.html
    More to keep your sense of humor.

Advanced Propulsion Concepts
http://sec353.jpl.nasa.gov/apc/
    Nasa's state of the art in atomic propulsion on the drawing boards

Advanced Propulsion Concepts-fission fragment rocket
http://sec353.jpl.nasa.gov/apc/Nuclear/10.html
    NASA's fastest proposal with 1,000,000 for specific impulse

Hector Parr's Essays: Time and Quantum Measurement
http://www.c-parr.freeserve.co.uk/hcp/quantum.htm
   Seems Einstein's theoretical physics may have been better than the
conventional
   theoretical physics widely taught in conventional formal classes

MILNET: Carey Sublette's Nuclear Weapons FAQ
http://www.milnet.com/milnet/nukeweap/Nfaq4.html
   Carey has not claimed to have designed a bomb but does have some
interesting
   links to public domain speculative designs with a link to CD for sell
"Swords of Armageddon".
   If memory serves. Not reviewed as my work is based on free info available
in public domain or free public library.

Declassified 1943 bomb design documents
http://lib-www.lanl.gov/la-pubs/00349710.pdf
  Shows why critical mass is not a calculation with incomplete theoretical
atomic physics equations of chain reaction speculated on, but requires a
direct physical measurement of radioactive metals available. Also included
are the disk, cylinder and sphere devices proposed by Einstein with his
booster design to obtain yields greater than that available with critical
mass upper limit designs by placing subcritical masses of radioactive metal
isotopes of 20% or greater purity between primary atomic explosions and the
casing walls to so fission and fusion from the inserts at higher than
conventional chemical mass impact velocities to give the required inertia or
momentum of impact shock waves on disk faces, cylinder center line and sphere
center to enable the pyrophoretic properties of radioactive metals by impact
found by accident again by the radioactive boyscout  above when he hammered
on the stuff with a screwdiver and in and another 40's critical mass accident
(above link) when a metal brick was dropped on a sub critical mass.