[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: starship-design: Massively Distributed Computing for SETI
In a message dated 3/18/01 9:29:35 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>>> I was getting significantly better speed numbers. More importantly
>> generation ship is a collosal waste. It requires a vastly larger, heavier,
>> more complicated ship. So much so, that the same propulsion gear could
>> you there in a fraction of the time. Hence a small craft that would
>> there in years, would be easier to do then one that would get there in
>I favor the slower ships because I can't see a practical high speed drive.
Same drives work about as well for a small fast ship, or a big slow ship.
I was figuring up to 40% c for Fuel sail.
>> Also trips that take generations are assured to get their AFTER ships
>> out decades after it left. Assuming anyone would bother to send them.
>That is based on the premise a FAST drive is possible.
If you can get a multigeneratin ship out at any non-laughable speed - you can
get a small short duratin ship up to far faster speeds.
>Lets face it
>any interstellar travel will require pushing all known technology
>to the limit, and it is hard to say exactly what will be possible in the
>future because factors can change suddenly. I think several designs
>need to be studied. For example
>suspension of life that is not possible now
>could be possible in the future with the study of DNA and other biological
>processes. This could favor slower ship for bulk transport and a high
>speed craft for living material.
For what purpose? The risk goes up tremendosly, but adds little benifit.