[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
starship-design: X-33 Cancelled,
hello all, i just got this off the space.com website. Here's a copy
WASHINGTON -- NASA announced Thursday that the problem-plagued X-33
spaceplane project, a venture that aimed to create a single-stage-to-orbit
spaceliner, has been scrapped. In addition, the American space agency
announced that another reusable rocket, the X-34, is being axed.
In total, these NASA resolutions add up to over $1 billion worth of
Related X-33 Multimedia
3-D X-33:Navigate around the X-33 spacecraft.ACTIVATE
"Obviously, there's a lot of disappointed folks, and I'm one of them,"
said Arthur Stephenson, director of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in
Huntsville, Alabama. The center is NASA's lead work force in creating
vehicles for routine and low-cost access to space.
Stephenson said that NASA will not add funds to the X-33 or X-34 programs
from money dedicated to the agency's Space Launch Initiative (SLI). NASA's
SLI is designed to push forward technology development for concepts that
would be able to launch payloads for NASA, commercial and military
missions, as well as fly crews to and from the International Space
The decision by NASA Thursday terminates work on the X-33, a cooperative
project between NASA and the lead industrial partner for the project, the
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Stephenson said.
The X-34 contract will expire, and rocket builder Orbital Sciences
Corporation of Dulles, Virginia was notified of the decision, Stephenson
NASA has spent to date $912 million on the X-33, with another $205 million
expended on the X-34 project.
In the case of the X-33, Lockheed Martin had invested $356 million of its
own monies in the effort to create a single-stage-to-orbit vehicle,
"I hate to see us not be able to go forward and complete these programs.
But we have to make good decisions fiscally, and be responsible in picking
those activities that can give us the greatest benefit. And flying these
vehicles turned out not to warrant the magnitude of the cost involved,"
The decision to terminate both X-33 and X-34 were made internally by NASA
and were not a White House decision, Stephenson said.
The X-34 program was initiated in 1996. It was to provide a low-cost
technology test bed that would demonstrate a streamlined management
approach with a rapid development schedule and limited testing.
A review by NASA and Orbital Sciences found the projected cost of
completing the X-34 had hit unacceptable levels and incurred too much
Troubled by technical snags, the X-33 rocket plane project, an effort to
spark creation of a commercial single-stage-to-orbit vehicle, has been the
topic of intense renegotiations between NASA and the lead industrial
partner for the project, the Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company.
Unveiled in July 1996 by then U.S. Vice President Al Gore and
still-on-assignment NASA Administrator, Daniel Goldin, the pilotless X-33
was slated to rocket skyward on the first of a series of suborbital test
hops three years later.
The X-33 design is based on a lifting-body shape with two novel "linear
aerospike" rocket engines and a rugged metallic thermal protection system.
The X-33 also features lightweight components and fuel tanks built to
conform to the vehicle's outer shape.
On February 6, tandem aerospike engines were test fired for the first time
at NASA's John C. Stennis Space Center in Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. That
blast went the full scheduled duration of 1.1 seconds with no observed
Eight more test firings of the twin-flight engines were planned at Stennis
before they were to be delivered to Lockheed Martin's X-33 assembly
facility in Palmdale, California. The qualification test firings of the
unique engines for the spaceplane were to lead to the first high-speed,
suborbital flight sometime in 2003.
NASA and Lockheed Martin jointly own the launch site for X-33 at Edwards
Air Force Base, along with the vehicle. "We'll be looking at what's the
best use of that launch site. I don't have a good answer to that at this
point," Stephenson told SPACE.com.
In a statement, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-California), chairman of the
House Science Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee, applauded NASA's
decision to terminate the X-33 and X-34 programs.
"I'm very happy to see that SLI is back on track advancing the national
launch capability. The decision to terminate the X-33 and X-34 sends the
signal that we expect corporate commitments to be kept.
Out the window
The X-33 experimental vehicle ran into myriad technical woes, tossing time
schedules for getting the spaceplane airborne out the window. Building the
X-33 had proven far from trouble free.
Stability of the sleek looking wedge-shaped craft at various speed ranges,
as well as its overall weight, has plagued designers. Novel "linear
aerospike" engines that would have powered the rocket plane also proved
troublesome to build.
In November 1999, an X-33 composite liquid-hydrogen tank ran into
difficulty while undergoing tests at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Long considered a major engineering hurdle, the tank lived up to that
reputation, causing a major launch slip and forcing NASA and Lockheed
Martin to take a second look at the entire program.
For Lockheed Martin, lessons learned in building and flying X-33 were seen
key to validating new technologies and reducing risk for the commercial
VentureStar -- the firm's fully reusable, single-stage-to-orbit vehicle.
"Getting to a single-stage-to-orbit was viewed as being very difficultand
it's still viewed as very difficult," Stephenson said.
"What we're hearing from industry and our own evaluation is that we
believe a single-stage-to-orbit vehicle for a second-generation vehicle [a
follow-on to the space shuttle] is not viable at this time. We are
focusing on multi-stage, beginning with a two-stage vehicle," Stephenson
Brian Berger and Stew Magnuson of Space News contributed to this report.