[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: starship-design: re: so you want to go faster than light . . .]

STAR1SHIP@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 7/25/00 4:07:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> clmanges@worldnet.att.net writes:
> >  I
> >  know of one physicist who postulates that GRB's are produced by
> superluminal
> >  stars, which is why I asked.
> >
> >  His website is at:   http://www.rideau.net/~gaasbeek/index.html#contents
> I read much of the sight and missed the GRB jargon you did not define, So I
> will answer on what I saw. Einstein claimed poorly designed experiments like
> miclal morleyson and others could prove noting either way so it would seem
> Gassbeek relying on them to support his theory is not valid. His
> understanding of relitivity in mor from the Lorents scool of closet etherist
> whose ideo of scientific thought is that if sound needs air to travel through
> then light needs something to travel through therefore the conjur up "ether"
> and spend time and grant money looking for it. They did not know enough to go
> back to the basics and see why sound needs air to transfer mechanical
> vibration and light propogates through a vaccum as an electro/magnetic wave.
> Time dilation was not proven by later experiment after Eintein died in the
> orbiting atomic clock and the earh twin clock returning time consistant with
> Einsteins equations' and in addition returning velocity real and velocity
> relativistic, therefore Gaasbeeks alternate relativity based on no time
> dilation is proven false by default as the counter proof does exist. His
> speculation about subatomic particals is not supported by experiment and his
> idea for a grand unified field theory contridicts Einsteins instructions for
> developing it.
> Provide GRB definition and I may revise what I say.
> >
> >  I'd be interested in your thoughts on this.
> I like his attidude to seek alternative theories when SR is no mistaught that
> the logical inconsistancies require questioning the SR theorys crediblity.
> Unscramble the misinformation of SR and stick with Einsteins understanding of
> it and Geesbeeks alt theory fails easily.
> Tom

Sorry. GRB is for Gamma Ray Burst. Go back to his website and click on "Frames of
Reference, Part 2";  it's number four in the table of contents on the index page.

> >  Curtis