[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: starship-design: Launch Craft.and IEC.
In a message dated 6/25/00 9:06:01 PM, email@example.com writes:
>> Actually I was talking about heating electrically. Generate a arc and
>> air that plows through it gets hot. The result is also pretty ionized
>> microwaves can be used to heat it more easily.
>It would have to be Direct conversion to electricity however.
Thyats standard for IEC with anti-nutronic fuels.
>> The papers were
>... CUT ....
>Since nobody has got fusion working with power gain, most of the
>ideas while valuable are outdated because when fusion does work
>all the numbers needs to be revised again.
True performance of real systems ae likely to varry. ;)
>> (This is an introduction to the application of Bussard's version of
>> Farnsworth/Hirsch electrostatic confinement fusion technology to
>> Which gives specific impulses of between 1500 and 5000 secounds.
>> Farnsworth/Hirsch demonstrated a 10**10 neutron flux with their device
>> in 1969 but it was dropped when panic ensued over the surprising stability
>> the Soviet Tokamak. Hirsch, responsible for the panic, has recently
>> and is back working on QED. -- Jim Bowery)
>I read the quote before, but that was with a D-T reaction and you can't
>experiment with D-T unless you be some TOP-SECRET HUSH HUSH LAB for
>USA government research. What I want to know is the % of fusion power to
>input power and the projected power output of the current batch of IEC
>devices now and 5 years down the road.
Other then desktop universty jobs I doubt anyone is looking into them
anymore. With a fuel gut and eco-groups fusion isn't very marketable, So the
commercial R&D pulled out late '80's. DOE has stated they won't fund
research into any new designs until they make their old systems work.
>Assuming it takes 100 watts for 1 second of thust,for 3,000 seconds
>that is 300Kw(225HP?) for 1 kg of thrust.1 Megawatt gives you 3 kg of thrust.
Actually no it would be a 100 watts, but 300,000 Watt seconds or .083
KW/hours. Since the 15 foot bussard reactor had a power output in the 10 E9
watts range, that provides more then enough power for a good sized ship.
>Good for a space tug but not a craft to take you into LEO.
>Darn back to good old chemical rockets. I still favor a two stage orbital
>craft... Manned 1st stage and unmanned 2 stage to dock at a space station.
>( I also favor 12/24 bit computers but that is another story )
>> Anyway if you go to a good library (especially a university libray) they
>> should be able to get you a copy of these easy. If that doesn't work
>> scan things in and mail you, but those images would keep both our modelm
>> going for a long time. ;)
>Ha - If I had access to that I would save on rent... just put my
>cot under that stack of books there and ...
A library can order you photocopies.