[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: starship-design: YES, we might do it.
> From: KellySt@aol.com
> In a message dated 10/19/98 8:18:01 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >> From: KellySt@aol.com
> >> Space tourisms ability to leverage costs to LEO orbit down
> >> to current trans ocean air-freght cost numbers is a big step up
> >> in accessing and using space.
> >I wonder why commsats, GPS, meteoats did not have
> >any significant impact on lowering costs to LEO significantly?
> They are to few to spawn a large enough market.
I do not have exact numbers, but I thing the number of
lauches was in the thousands range.
Is it still not large enogh?
> >Yes and no. At least Mars Base will bring a lot of data
> >on the conditions there, necessary to design and build
> >further non-governemnt facilities and colonies.
> >Hence, it will lower significantly the initial investment
> >needed for the private exploration of Mars.
> Ah ha. Somehow I don't think we need to spend 100's of billions
> to figure out ways to save tens of billions.
Hmm, it seems to sound quite right... ;-(
So, we should either make NASA more efficient (which is next
to impossible, I am afraid), or dissolve it completely.
Then possible government support for frontier-breaking
enterprises may take the form of "Space Achievement Prizes"
akin to the "Mars Prizes" proposal of Zubrin & Gingrich.
The NASA may then be left only as
a Space Prizes Administering Office...
I wonder why they seem not to make any measures
to implement the scheme?