[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: starship-design: Re: debate
Kelly St wrote:
>In a message dated 12/9/97 11:37:12 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>Look. I've never written anything here with any contradictions,
>>obvious or otherwise. You just have an incredible capacity to
>>misread, misinterpret, and/or unjustifiably assume things. The
>>most aggravating thing about trying to discuss anything with you
>>is your inability to comprehend precisely what's written and
>>the way you inject straw-men which aren't even hinted at.
>I.E. your not being unclear, I'm just to stupid to understand what your
>talking about? Try again.
Maybe you are too stupid. After all, you yourself just wrote:
<You math doesn't add up. If you were keeping the fuel ratio the same and
<assuming an unrefulled round trip you'ld have to square the fuel ration not
If this statement isn't indicative of stupidity, what is?
>Or, you could try describing your system, in
>detail, and list why you think it would save significant power, and I'll
>comment on it.
That's what I did with my very first post on it.
_____ Isaac Kuo email@example.com http://www.csc.lsu.edu/~kuo
/___________\ "Mari-san... Yokatta...
\=\)-----(/=/ ...Yokatta go-buji de..." - Karigari Hiroshi