[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: starship-design: Timothy's beamed power paper
> From: jimaclem@juno.com
>
> Oops, sorry bout' that. Here goes again.
>
> payload --> OO
> compression mbr. ||
> _________________ __________________
> \ ||
> /
> \ ||
> /
> \ ||
> /
> \ || /
> \ || /
> tension mbr. \ || /
> \ || /
> \ || /
> \ || /
> ||
>
> Hope this is better. The sail pulls a column that passes through the
> sail, with the payload on top, away from the Earth side of the sail.
>
Sorry, did not work this time either.
Did you compose the art using fixed font?
If your mailer uses a proportional font, the effects
would be just that, on any receiver's screen using
different font than yours (e.g., on mine - the standard fixed font
like Courier or Monospaced used by most mailers).
And note also a strange line I have found in the header of your mail:
> X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,2-58,60-95,97,99,101-109,111-113
Concerning the idea itself, I have doubts:
- the central compression column must quite thick, hence heavy:
the problem is not so much with compression strength
as with bending of long (relative to width) objects
compressed lengthwise (the effect is called "buckling"
if I am not mistaken).
- the construction will be rather unstable (like Wright brothers
early planes, with their tail-first design): the central column
wil tend to veer to the sides.
The parachute design seems much better; the payload can be
shielded from the beam by a small sail supported by correspondingly
small truss structure.
-- Zenon