[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Problems with beaming
- To: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com
- Subject: Problems with beaming
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1996 20:58:24 +0100
To Lee,
>There are two problems really. First of all; there is the inverse square
>law, the intensity (and therefore the power) of radiation decreases as the
>inverse square of the distance. I have not seen anyone's calculations here
>take into account the amount of power that must be generated HERE in order
>to provide a reasonable amount of power THERE.
Yes, but lasers keep a tight beam and thus their diametre (cross-section)
does not increase with distance and the energy-density (per surface) stays
the same.
So I don't see a problem here.
>The second problem involves another aspect of basic optical diffraction
>theory; the Rayleigh criterion defines the required diameter of the laser
>transmitter. For yellow light, a 400 km aperture transmitter would be
>required to just fill a light sail at Tau Ceti, 11 light years away.
The criterion of Rayleigh states that two wavelengths l and l+dl are just
resolved in the n-th spectral order when the maximum of one spectral-line
falls upon the first minimum of the other.
I don't see what resolvement has to do with beaming power, could you explain
what I missed?
(What formula did you use?)
Timothy