[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: Timothy van der Linden <T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl>*Subject*: Re: Comparison of Sail vs. RAM (Was Laser Aperture Size)*From*: Kevin C Houston <hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu>*Date*: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 16:59:12 -0600 (CST)*cc*: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.fw.hac.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, DotarSojat@aol.com*In-Reply-To*: <199603290004.AA24501@student.utwente.nl>

Tim: > Kevin: > >have no clue as to how to find it (aside from trial and error which is > >what I intend to do this weekend) > > Since you probably don't have the right formulas trial and error will not > work either, finding these may indeed by a bit nasty. Since I've done such > calculations before, it will be a bit easier for me. > > >Any help will be greatly appreciated.. > > Well, I suppose you want to find the solution that consumes the least energy > (not necessary the least reaction mass). > > So we need to optimize the energy. > > Energy needed to decelerate a ship depends on it's empty mass, its start > velocity, the exhaust velocity. > > E(Mo,Vstart,Vexh) > > 1 > ------------------ > 2 > (1) g = Vexh > Sqrt[1 - ------] > 2 > c > > M[t] a > (2) j[t] = -------- > g Vexh > > c Vstart > (4) T = --- ArcTanh[--------] > a c > > T > / > (5) M[t] = Mo + | j[t] dt > / > t > > T > a / > (6) M[t] = Mo + -------- | M[t] dt > g Vexh / > t > > Solving this differential equation gives: > > a (T - t) > (7) M[t] = Mo Exp[-----------] > g Vexh > > T > 2 / > (9) Ek = c (g-1) | j[t] dt > / > 0 > > 2 a T > (10) Ek = c (g-1) Mo Exp [--------] > g Vexh > > 2 c Vstart > (11) Ek = c (g-1) Mo Exp [-------- ArcTanh[--------]] > g Vexh c > > Finally... E(Mo,Vstart,Vexh) > > > Now we only need to find its minimum, that's easy: solve dE/dVexh=0 > > Well, that's not easy but the minima are: > > Vstart Vexh optimal Fuel:ship-ratio Energy per kg of ship (in Joules) > 0.1 0.05 7.4 8E14 > 0.2 0.10 7.4 3E15 > 0.3 0.15 7.3 8E15 > 0.4 0.21 7.2 1E16 > 0.5 0.27 7.1 2E16 > 0.6 0.34 6.9 4E16 > 0.7 0.41 6.8 6E16 > 0.8 0.51 6.4 9E16 > 0.9 0.64 5.9 2E17 > 0.99 0.87 4.5 4E17 > 0.9996 0.957 3.6 8E17 > But does this take into account the push from the maser? I think I understand what you did, but I am not at all sure that I comprehend the details. assuming that we went on a continuous 1 G thrust profile, we should be near .9905 at turn around (your Vstart?) then optimal Vexh is .87 and RM to ship ratio is 4.5 to 1, and the masers have to provide 4E17 Joules /sec/Kg = Watts/Kg ????! I really really want to thank you for taking the time to do the calculation. but could you please explain the result? Kevin

**References**:**Re: Comparison of Sail vs. RAM (Was Laser Aperture Size)***From:*T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)

- Prev by Date:
**Wait a moment** - Next by Date:
**Re: Wait a moment** - Prev by thread:
**Re: Comparison of Sail vs. RAM (Was Laser Aperture Size)** - Next by thread:
**Wait a moment** - Index(es):