Mission purpose

[kgstar@most.fw.hac.com (Kelly Starks x7066 MS 10-39)]

At 10:53 AM 3/12/96, Kelly Starks x7066 MS 10-39 wrote:
>At 10:42 AM 3/12/96, David Levine wrote:
>>Kelly Starks x7066 MS 10-39 wrote:
>>> Dave, what have you forwarded to him of our recent correspondence?
>>>
>>> Kelly
>>
>>Um, nothing.  Instead of forwarding huge loads of
>>mail, I thought a summary might have been better.  But
>>most of this is technically above me...  Anyone want
>>to give it a crack?
>>
>>David
>
>
>I could forward the text of my summary web pages.  They are about as close
>to a FAQ sheet as we have, and everyone else can fill in the blanks.
>
>Any complaints?
>
>Kelly
>

Mission purpose


Why do we want to go to another star anyway? We obviously have to want to
do it pretty badly, or we would never pay for all this.  Presumably this
isn't some kind of cold war stunt like Apollo, where we go plant a flag and
come home and drop it all.  We certainly aren't likely to get any immediate
financial benefit.  We absolutely don't have any problems back home
(hunger, famine, mineral depletion, etc..) that this could help.  So what
do we want out of the flight?




Exploration of the planets and moons in another star system

Advantages

*Very popular idea with public.

*Possibility of tremendous scientific returns.


Disadvantages

*Expensive.  You'd need a huge ship to carry all of the hundreds of
researchers, surveyors, and all the support staff and advanced equipment it
would take to do even a minimal job of surveying a new star system.

*A planet with a Earth-like ecology it would be a biological death trap.
Alien microbes, allergens, and other unknowns life forms would easily
defeat unprepared Earth mammalian immune systems.  The ground teams would
be in an area that would be worse, to them, than biological war back on
Earth.

*On a planet with a non-Earth-like ecology it still could be a biological
death trap, and in addition have basic climate and biosphere
incompatibilities (Wrong temperatures, air pressures, gravity).

*This is a massive undertaking.  You'd only try it if you really wanted to
explore.  This would require a major national (or international?)
commitment.




Colonization of planets or moons

Advantages

*Very popular idea with public.

*Excellent staging area for direct examination of that planet or moon.


Disadvantages

*Expensive.  Either the colony would need to be the size of a major city to
support all of the specialists needed to support a self sustaining society,
or regular (extremely expensive) supply flights from earth would be
necessary.

*On a planet with a Earth-like ecology it would be a biological death trap.
Alien microbes, allergens, and other unknowns life forms would easily
defeat unprepared Earth mammalian immune systems.

*On a planet with a non-Earth-like ecology it still could be a biological
death trap, and in addition have basic climate and biosphere
incompatibilities (Wrong temperatures, air pressures, gravity).

*Isolation from resources.  Ores, energy and raw materials are far harder
to access on a planet than in space.

*Isolation from other planets.

*Their doesn't seem to be enough practical justification for such a massive
undertaking.  Again, it would require a major commitment or resources.
Which means a major public interest.



Colonization of constructed space platforms

Advantages

*Still may be a very popular idea with public.

*Excellent staging area for examination of the solar system.

*Much lower biological threat than on a planet with biosphere.

*The internal gravity, radiation, and environment can be precisely tailored
to humans.

*Far easier to construct and service than a planet bound colony.

*Easy access to plentiful resources.  (Space is considered so much richer
in cheap, easy to access resources and power.  That it is expected that
Earth's heavy industry will migrate into space in the next century.)

*Could act as a servicing center and supply port for the starship, or
subsequent starships.


Disadvantages

*Expensive.  Either the colony would need to be the size of a major city to
support all of the specialists needed to support a self sustaining society,
or regular (extremely expensive) supply flights from earth would be
necessary.

*Their doesn't seem to be enough practical justification for such a massive
undertaking.  Again, it would require a major commitment or resources.
Which means a major public interest.




Infrastructure construction

Advantages

*This could establish facilities necessary for routine, lower cost, flights
between home and this starsystem.

Disadvantages

*Construction could take so many resources that little or no exploration
will be done.

*Less interesting to public than an exploration or colony program.  So it
might have a harder time getting funded.  But it could be part of a first
flight the opens up the star system for larger follow on flights.

*Could be very expensive.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Kelly Starks                       Internet: kgstar@most.fw.hac.com
Sr. Systems Engineer
Magnavox Electronic Systems Company
(Magnavox URL: http://www.fw.hac.com/external.html)

----------------------------------------------------------------------