[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Orbit B
- To: KellySt@aol.com, kgstar@most.magec.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@InterWorld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, bmansur@oc.edu
- Subject: Re: Orbit B
- From: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl (Timothy van der Linden)
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 17:40:02 +0100
>> You have managed to overcome the problem of a forward and backward moving
>> beam in the same lane. But by solving that problem you added another (how
>> could it have been different) namely that the distance between mirror and
>> our ship has been lengthened by I think at least 4 ly.
>
>yes, it looks that way. BTW, i don't think we can let the RR crash into
>the target star, if we do, then the decell beam will cut out with 2
>light-years to go (assuming a 4 LY separation)
It should not even fly close to TC, otherwise gravity would bend it path in
a way we might not like it.
Tim