[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another piece of the puzzle?
- To: T.L.G.vanderLinden@student.utwente.nl, kgstar@most.magec.com, stevev@efn.org, jim@bogie2.bio.purdue.edu, zkulpa@zmit1.ippt.gov.pl, hous0042@maroon.tc.umn.edu, rddesign@wolfenet.com, David@interworld.com, lparker@destin.gulfnet.com, bmansur@oc.edu
- Subject: Re: Another piece of the puzzle?
- From: KellySt@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 18:11:12 -0500
> Could we use polarisation as a way to eliminate the effect
> of a backward and forward moving beam in the same path.
> What if we can make it so that the forward moving beam is
> horizontally polarized and the backwardmoving beam is
> vertically polarized? All the ships sail? has to do is to
> discriminate between both kinds of
> polarizations and thus reflect only on of the two.
Hummm. Could making the mesh out of long open strips, not open squares,
effect its reactions to a polorized beam?
Kelly