From mmreturn@magnetdev.com Tue Mar 9 07:00:10 2010 Return-Path: Received: from mail36.magnet101.com (mail36.magnet101.com [209.18.93.36]) by smtp.XXXXXXX.XXX (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o29F07vY018725 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:00:09 -0800 Message-Id: <201003091500.o29F07vY018725@smtp.XXXXXXX.XXX> Received: from MAGNETMAIL3 (172.17.36.3) by mail36.magnet101.com id hiph7i0ir7o8 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:32:14 -0500 (envelope-from ) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:32:13 -0500 From: editor@principalinvestigators.org To: Subject: "Fair Use" vs. Plagiarism X-TokenInfo-NoToken: X-Bps1: 5076722339 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_NextPart_000_950757_201039_9321392" X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2010-03-09_10:2010-02-06,2010-03-09,2010-03-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=100 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1003090108 --_NextPart_000_950757_201039_9321392 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable PI e-Alert features expert advice on managerial and administrative challeng= es which confront Principal Investigators in every field of science researc= h. =09 No. 19, March 8-12, 2010 Intellectual Property: Dividing Line Between "Fair Use" and Plagiarism?=20 Reader Question: =20 One of my postdoc students is preparing his first paper for a science journ= al. On reviewing his draft, I am concerned about the amount of direct quot= ation, and even paraphrasing, he has used from prior publications by others= . I am happy he has at least done a thorough search of the previous literat= ure, but what is the dividing line between "fair use" and plagiarism?=20 =20 Expert Comments:=20 Given the importance of building on previous work, it is inevitable that re= searchers and academicians will use in their articles a great deal of direc= t quotation and paraphrasing from previous literature. Thus, it is importan= t for them to understand the boundaries of fair use. Put simply, fair use = is a defense=20 View the remainder of the expert comments at http:/= /www.principalinvestigators.org/news.php Agree? Disagree? Submit your comments at XXXXXXXwww= .principalinvestigators.org/news.php Comments by Suzanne K. Ketler, J.D., Ph.D., Roetzel & Andress, Akron, OH., = She concentrates her practice in the area of Intellectual Property.=20 The foregoing has been legal information only and should not be considered = legal advice on a specific issue. For legal advice, the reader should cont= act legal counsel of his or her choice. ??Preview of Next Week's Question?? No. 20, March 15-19, 2010 Reader Question:=20 I am moving to another institution. Am I able to move my grant to this new = organization? If so, what steps do I need to take? =20 Submit your early bird comments at XXXXXXXwww.principalinvestigators.org/ne= ws.php Missed Last Weeks's Question? Reader Question: Can study section reviews and scores be appealed? How does an appeal work? = How often are such appeals successful? View the expert comments at XXXXXXXwww.principalinv= estigators.org/news.php Comments by Christopher Francklyn, Ph.D. Dr. Francklyn is a former Study Se= ction Chair and veteran reviewer for NIH and NSF study sections. He is a pr= ofessor at University of Vermont, where his scientific expertise is in prot= ein synthesis and RNA-Protein interactions. Dr. Francklyn provides a regular column, Study Section Insider, in Principa= l Investigator Advisor monthly newsletter. View his previous article in las= t month's issue: The Three Reviewers Critical to your Grant's Success at ht= tp://www.principalinvestigators.org/sample_issue_request_form.=20 Be on the lookout for his new column in the March issue: 5 Common Mistakes = that Will Sink Your Grant . =20 This issue was brought to you as a service by Princ= ipal Investigators Association. If you have general questions or comments c= ontact us at editor@principalinvestigators.org (mailto:editor@principalinve= stigators.org). =20 * Please note that in some cases the unsubscribe li= nks in these messages can become broken by the way that an email program di= splays the message. If you are having trouble unsubscribing you may also fo= rward this message to unsubscribe@principalinvestigators.org (mailto:unsubs= cribe@principalinvestigators.org) with the word 'remove' in the email messa= ge subject line. Principal Investigators Association=20 3565 10th St N, Suite B Naples, FL 34103 USA (800) 303-0129 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 Click here (XXXXXXXwww.magnetmail.net/actions/subscription_manage_PRININV= EST.cfm?subId=3D809&email=3DXXX@XXXXXXXX.XXXXXXX.XXX&message_id=3D950757) to unsubscribe= =0A=0D************************************************************** =0A35= 65 10th Street N, Naples, FL 34103 =0A************************************= **************************=0AUse this link to unsubscribe: XXXXXXXwww.magnetmail.net/Actions/unsubscribe.cfm?message_id=3D950757&user_= id=3DPRININVEST&recipient_id=3DXXXXXXXXX&email=3DXXX@XXXXXXXX.XXXXXXX.XXX&gro= up_id=3D447176 --_NextPart_000_950757_201039_9321392 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A =0A
=0A

Please add "editor@principalinvestigators.org" to your w= hitelist or address book, so that you have no trouble receiving future iss= ues!

=0A =0A
3D""
  =0A =0A =0A
=0A

PI e-Alert weekly e-zine is delivered worldwide.<= /font> =0A Feel free to share this issue with f= riends and colleagues. Subscribe = Today!

=0A =0A =0A
=0A

PI e-Alert features expert advice on managerial and admi= nistrative challenges which confront Principal Investigators in every= field of science research. If such matters are not of interest to yo= u or your associates, please accept our apologies and “unsubscr= ibe” at the bottom of the page.


=0A =0A
=0A

No. 19, March 8-12, 20= 10

=0A =0A

Intellectual Property:

Dividing Line Between "Fair Use" and Plagiarism?=

=0A =0A

= Reader Question:  =0AOne of my postdoc students is pr= eparing his first paper for a science journal. On reviewing his draft, I a= m concerned about the amount of direct quotation, and even paraphrasing, he= has used from prior publications by others. I am happy he has at least don= e a thorough search of the previous literature, but what is the dividing li= ne between "fair use" and plagiarism?

=
=0A

Expert Comments= : Given the importance of building on previous work, it is inevitable that researchers and academicians will use in th= eir articles a great deal of direct quotation and paraphrasing from previou= s literature. Thus, it is important for them to understand the boundaries o= f fair use. Put simply, fair use is a defense 

=0A

View the remainder of the expert comments

=0A

Agree? = Disagree? Submit you= r comments

=0A =0A

Comments by=0A Suzanne K. K= etler, J.D., Ph.D., =0ARoetzel & Andress, Akron, OH., She concentr= ates her practice in the area of Intellectual Property.<= em>

=0A =0A

The foregoing has been legal informati= on only and should not be considered legal advice on a specific issue. For= legal advice, the reader should contact legal counsel of his or her choice= .



=0A =0A =0A =0A =0A
=0A

??Preview= of Next Week's Question??

=0A

No. 20, March 15-19, 2= 010

=0A

Reader Question= : I am moving to another institution. Am I able to move my gr= ant to this new organization? If so, what steps do I need to take?=0A


=0A

          

&n= bsp; =0A

 

=0A

Don't Miss March'= s Feature Event on NI= H's Short Form:

=0A

3D""

 


=0A =0A
=0A

Missed Last= Weeks's Question?

=0A

Reader Question= : Can study section reviews and scores be appealed? How does a= n appeal work? How often are such appeals successful?

=0A

View the expert comments

=0A

Comments by=0A Christopher Francklyn, Ph.D. =0ADr. Francklyn is a former= Study Section Chair and veteran reviewer for NIH and NSF study sections. H= e is a professor at University of Vermont, where his scientific expertise i= s in protein synthesis and RNA-Protein interactions.

=0A =0A

Dr. Francklyn provides a regular column= , Study Section Insider, in=0A Principal Investigator Advisor =0Am= onthly newsletter. View his previous article in last month's issue: The Three Reviewers Critical to your Grant&rsquo= ;s Success .

=0A =0A

Be on the lookout for his new column in= the March issue: 5 Common Mistakes that Will Sink Your Grant .

&n= bsp; =0A

 

=0A

3D""




=0A =0A
This issue was broug= ht to you as a service by Principal Investigators Association= . =0AIf you have general questions or comments contact us at editor@pri= ncipalinvestigators.org. =0A =0A

* Please note that in some cases the un= subscribe links in these messages can become broken by the way that an emai= l program displays the message. If you are having trouble unsubscribing you= may also forward this message to unsubscribe@principalinvestigators.or= g with the word 'remove' in the email message su= bject line.

=0A

Principal Investigato= rs Association 
3565 10th St N, Suite B
Naples, FL 34103 USA
(800) 303-0129

=0A

 

=0A

Click here to unsubscribe

=0A
=0A

3565 10th Street N,= Naples, FL 34103

=0A
=0A --_NextPart_000_950757_201039_9321392--