:
Learning objectives
This unit will present a general introduction to the notion of Petrarchism. At the end of this unit students should be able to: a) Discuss some of the current definitions of Petrarchism; b) Identify its major features; c) Appreciate the difference between Petrarch’s and Petrarchist’s poems. We will address the following topics and questions:
1. What is Petrarchisms? What are its origins and major features?
2. Why some critics define Petrarchism as "literary disease"?
2. Why some critics identify Petrarchism with a kind of poetry lacking sincerity?
3. What is the difference between a normative and a non-normative definition of Petrarchism?
4. What do critics mean by “Petrarchan system”?
5. Is there any difference between Petrarch’s poetry and the poetry written by the Petrarchists?
Lecture
This will be a Power Point presentation to provide a general introduction to Petrarchism. The instructor will give a general overview of the course and in specific of the reading material for the first learning unit. He will introduce the questions at the core of the unit without providing exhaustive answers. Student will answer these questions in the wiki after reading the course material. See instructions below.
Assignments:
Readings:
- Petrarch, Canzoniere, 1. This is the opening poem of Petrarch collection.
- Matteo Maria Boiardo, Amorum Libri, 1. This is the opening poem of the collection of one of the most important Petrarchists of the Quattrocento: Boiardo.
- Berdan, J.M., "A definition of Petrarchismo," in Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 24 (1909): 699-710. This article defines Petrarchism as lack of sincerity.
- Forster, L.W., "European Petrarchism as Training in Poetic Diction," Italian Studies 18 (1963): 19-32. Re-printed in Id. The icy Fire - Five Studies in European Petrarchism, Cambridge, 1969. This article explores the idea of a “Petrarchan system.”
-Wilkins, E.H., "A General Survey of Renaissance Petrarchism," Comparative Literature, 2 (1950): 327-342. This article provides a broad non normative definition of Petrarchism.
Project:
Explore some of the feautures of the Petrarch Project. Log into the Petrarch Project and read the poems of Petrarch and Boiardo included in the syllabus for this week.
Electronic forum:
The forum for week one is articulated in four parts, the first is focused on Petrarch opening poem and should be concluded by Tuesday at noon, the second on a poem by Boiardo and should be concluded by Thursday at noon. Part one and two are based on a group diachronic discussion in the Forum section of the Blackboard. Each member of the group will contribute to the discussion with one personal entry of at least 200 words and one answer to someone’ else post of at least 50 words for each part.
Finally the third part of the forum is based on the summary of the discussion on the two poems and on the other reading material for this week. One member of the group should write the summary of the group discussion in the Wiki associated to the class. The summary should be about 250 words and posted in the wiki by Friday at noon. Part four: each member of the group has to add a paragraph of about 200 words to the summary written by the group leader. These individual posts to be added to the summary should further discuss the summary of the group discussion the the light of the reading material for this week. These individual posts in the Wiki should be completed by Sunday at midnight.
PART ONE (Discussion board) |
PART TWO (Discussion board) |
PART THREE (Wiki) |
PART FOUR (Wiki) |
Discuss Petrarch's poem by Tuesday at noon |
Discuss Boiardo's poem by Thursday at noon |
Write a Summary of the Electronic forum by Friday at noon |
Add a paragraph to the summary by Sunday at midnight |
Students engagement inventory and rubric
EXPECTED STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY |
HOURS STUDENTS ENGAGED |
Attendance |
3 (Actual presence in the classroom) |
Assigned readings |
4 |
On line interaction |
5 |
Total hours |
12 |
ELECTRONIC FORUM AND WIKI RUBRIC |
Quality
|
Relevance |
Contribution |
Global
Picture |
Appropriate comments:
thoughtful, reflective, and respectful of other student's postings. |
Clear reference
to assignment or prior posting being discussed |
Furthers the discussion
with questions, or statements that encourage others to respond.
Participates beyond the required number of postings. |
Clearly connects
the posting to text or reference points from previous readings,
activities, and discussions. |
7,5 |
7,5 |
7,5 |
7,5 |
Appropriate comments and responds respectfully to other
student's postings, |
Some reference but taken out of context, the reader
would not understand. |
Participates, but does not post anything that encourages
others to respond to the posting. Participates with the required number
of postings. |
Vague or possible connection to reference points from
previous readings, activities, and discussions. |
6,2 |
6,2 |
6,2 |
6,2 |
Responds, but with minimum effort. (i.e. "I agree with
Bob") |
Posting is attached to the right discussion board,
but does not clearly reflect the assignment. |
Less than required number of postings. Does not further
any discussions |
Mentions the text or previous activity without logical
link to topic. |
4,0 |
4,0 |
4,0 |
4,0 |
TOP
| |