Write each commentary as a letter to the writer of the paper you are reviewing. The purpose of the commentary is to help the writer to produce the best revision possible. In the body of the letter, answer the questions which seem most important for the particular paper you are reading. Always answer questions #1and #3.
Critic:_____________________________
Writer:______________________________
Part One
1. What question is the paper
trying to answer? What is the question at issue? Is this really an interesting
question for this audience? Can the writer make progress toward answering this
question in a short paper?
2. Do you have the background
information you need to understand the question at issue? Is there anything
more that needs to be done to show you why the issue is
interesting/important/worth one's time?
3. What answer does the paper
give?
4. Does the paper support its
answer with good reasoning, appropriate examples, quotations, definitions,
etc.?
5. Who is the implied audience for
this paper? Who would be at least to some degree persuaded by it? What
assumptions would such an audience share with the writer?
6. Who would reject the reasoning
of this paper? Who would be persuaded very little or not at all? What would
such people say in response to this paper? Does the paper recognize at least to
some degree the objections that could be made to its line of reasoning?
7. What is the structure of the
paper? Does it follow from the central purpose of reasoning with the audience
about the question? Do some parts of the paper seem out of place?
8. Has the writer demonstrated a
sufficient knowledge of the readings for the course, and have the readings been
used well to reason about the question?
9. Has the writer earned his or
her conclusion? If not, what more could he or she do?
Part Two
10. What expectations does the
title of the paper create? What does the title lead you to believe?
11. What expectations does the
first paragraph create? Based on a reading of the first paragraph, what do you
expect the rest of the paper to do?
12. Is the paragraphing
appropriate? Are the transitions between the paragraphs effective? Do the
paragraphing and the transitions help to clarify the line of reasoning?
13. Do the paragraphs all
contribute to the aim of the paper or do some seem to be off task?
14. How does the paper end? Does
the ending have a clear relation to what has come before it??
15. Are there sentence-level problems
in the paper? Which one or two kinds of problem seem to cause the most
difficulty?
16. What is the single strongest part of the paper? Why?