Hist 387_5 Some additional aspects concerning the 'Hundred Philosophical Schools'
The 'Age of Philosophy' in a Time of
War
The emergence of the 'Hundred Philosophical Schools' was the
result of changes in the political and economic scene of the Zhou. Extensive
warfare with all its implications led to the search for an ideal government
and the realization of ideals in education which ultimately would lead to the
evolution of a humane society. This society would ideally be constituted by
rulers and subjects of high morale. Driven by loyalty and ethical considerations,
all levels of the social hierarchy would be responsible, honest, and righteous
personalities. The ways to achive this ideal were very different.
The change from chariot warfare to battles with large infantries and cavalry
units called for military experts. In this climate, Master Sun, Sunzi or Sun
Wu (6th cent. BCE) wrote the famous book 'The Art of War'. Different from what
the title seems to suggest, Sunzi teaches that the most successful general is
the one who spares lives, of his own men and of the enemy, but skillfully applies
strategies and tactics that avoid major bloodshed.
Confucianists (School of the Scholars,
rujia):
It was not during the lifetime of Confucius that Confucianism
became a dominant school. Therefore Confucius regarded his mission as failed.
Only in the Han Dynasty (206 BCE-22 CE) were his philosophical maxims appreciated
as an influential force in the formation of statecraft and ritual, and formed
the basis of education. Nevertheless different philosophical schools competed
even then.
Finally, in the process of re-evaluation of antique
values and the evolution of a metaphysical superstructure during the Song Dynasty
(960-1279) Confucianism gained the dominant importance for the individual and
the state that makes us today identify certain ideas and concepts as characteristically
Confucian.
Confucius (551 - 479 BCE):
- saw himself not as as the inventor of a philosophical tradition but as a teacher
who transmitted the values of the ancient sages to his contemporaries ("I
transmit, I invent nothing. I trust and love the past"); his main
concerns were ethics and morale; the fact that his teachings were the most effective
in Chinese history compared to other schools, shows that his ideals were considered
applicable in social and political life; his ideals are summarized in his 'Analects',
composed by his disciples between 465 and 450 BCE.
- Confucius came from a family of impoverished aristocrats
and worked until the age of 22 as the supervisor of the granaries owned by the
influential Ji clan. Dissatisfied with his job he began to teach and became
a popular teacher. One of the reasons for his popularity may have been that
he did not make a difference between wealthy and poor disciples. The idea of
self cultivation dominated his teachings; taking responsibility for one's actions,
behavior, and countenance was essential in order to attain moral perfection.
And moral perfection could serve as a model which would be emulated by others.
- Rituals and ceremonies were the means to define
and form moral conduct in politics as in everyday family life. Education will
teach moral behavior, ritual will be used to put the ideals into practice. This
will unfailingly lead to mutual respect between individuals and social classes.
Ultimately the result will be peace within society. To rulers who were experienced
in warfare and trained in getting rid of opponents by killing and betrayal these
ideals must have been exceptionally challenging. Though ruling through benevolence
was not necessarily on their agenda, eventually some rulers were impressed enough
to call Confucius to an official position. He became a rather successful official
for some time but finally quit his job when he wanted to indicate his objections
against his lord's negligent conduct as a ruler. (The ruler of Lu had more fun
with the 80 ladies who sang and danced at his court than with the government
of his state.)
Confucius believed that if his teachings were firmly
embedded within the smallest unit of the state, the family, the multiplication
factor would inevitablt lead to a harmonized state because on every level of
society his social values of civility would be shared and honored.
Menzius (ca. 372 - 289 BCE)
- also hailed from the state Lu. Since his father died early his mother had
to face all the difficulties single mothers have to overcome. She educated her
son herself and instilled in him a love for studying. As an adult he became
an advisor to several aristocrats which he openly critisized for their often
ostentatious lifestyle. His critique was based on the idea that the innate nature
of man at birth was good, independent from one's social position. Education
could help to lead a person to moral perfection, no matter what his or her material
or social background was. Since man is the most important creature in the cosmos,
humaneness ought to be a ruler's goal, not craving to accumulate the riches
for himself. Every ruler depended on his subjects. Therefore he should treat
them with benevolence. Otherwise the people could revolt against a tyrannical
head of state - a deserved punishment for his misbehavior. Mencius defined the
welfare of the people as the basis of a wealthy and well ordered state. Filiality
and respect were the pillars of a well-ordered family.
Xunzi (ca. 310 - 210 BCE; 298? - 238 BCE)
- just as in the teachings of Confucius and Mencius the basis of his ideals
were humaneness and morality. Yet confronted with the harsh reality of his times
he was convinced that the innate nature of man at birth is bad. Only education
and self-cultivation can improve his moral behavior. Without education man is
prone to follow his basic instincts of greed and avarice. And only education
can secure the order of a hierarchical society. Without this order the state
is prone to fall into chaos. To preserve this order, a set of laws was considered
essential.
Daoists (daojia):
Laozi (?), supposedly the author of the Daodejing (Classic of the Way and Integrity) which was written before 300 BCE.
Laozi riding his water
buffalo when leaving China
Zhuangzi (355? - 275 BCE; 365 - 290 BCE)
Different from the other schools mentioned here, the
Daoists were less concerned with the role of the individual within society.
Much more important than the process of 'cultivation' and 'socialization' of
a person that was suitable for society, the Daoists stressed the importance
of the overwhelming power and significance of nature. Man and his 'artificial'
constructs of society were considered far less important than the recognition
that man is but one -minor- element within the great cosmological order. The
inherent order in nature could be understood once the 'Way' was identified as
the observance and acceptance of the cycles of nature. This ideology was hardly
suitable to construct political entities for statecraft but served those who
preferred the path of an (inner) immigration from social responsibilities.
Education was seen as restraint, a forceful adaptation of abstract ideals not
inherent in man. While Daoism may provide the individual with insight and mental
balance, it rejected hierarchies of authorities and to some degree is anarchistic.
Collective action was just as opposed as the force exerted in the process of
education, the force to acknowledge a defined role within the social hierarchy
that aimed at stability through subjugation. Daoism supported individuality,
spontaneity, and uninhibited authenticity of the personality. To act in accordance
with one's nature, not against one's nature was the goal. To complete one's
life cycle in peace and harmony of body and mind was the ultimate realization
of the Dao.
Mohists (School of the 'Preachers'):
Mozi or Mo Di (480? - 400 BCE?)
- was the most egalitarian of the important philosophers
of the time since his teachings did not allow for privileges of the class of
'gentlemen' over the common people. Cultural refinement, luxury, music, and
the fine arts were considered superfluous because they did not help to unify
the population. Instead they solidified or created differences in society, as
did the Confucian concept of unconditioned loyalty among family and clan-members.
Luxuries had to be produced by many to delight a few, an unjust distribution
of the functionality of such objects.
- Impartial care for everyone,
- the abolition of aggressive wars (not self-defense),
- and the functionality of production
were the three components forming Mozi's teachings.
Legalists (School of the 'Theorists
of the State'; fajia):
- can be considered as the first philosophers who tried set up a system of legal
regulations and penal laws that were to be acknowledged by all members of society
- from slave to ruler. The demands of the legalists were feared by the Confucianists
because they positioned obeisance of laws above benevolence and humaneness.
Shen Buhai (400 - 337 BCE)
Shang Yang (390 - 338 BCE)
- was the most rigorous among the legalists: He stated that the wise
man creates laws, the dumb man will be ruled by laws.
Laws replaced ethical requirements such as morality, humaneness,
filial piety, self-cultivation and loyalty.
A politically weak but physically able people is the foundation of a strong
state. In order to keep the state strong and the laws effective severe punishments
were to be installed that could be applied to anybody, regardless of his social
position.
A productive agriculture was seen as the essential basis for
the state, artisanship and trade were of secondary importance.
The military was to be strengthened, weights and measured to be unified. All
of these measures were put into practice in the state of Qin where Shang Yang
was appointed as an advisor to the ruler in 361 BCE, the ruler who came to be
the despotic First Emperor, Qin Shihuangdi. Confucian ceremonies were regarded
as expensive and superfluous. The Confucian ideals derived from the past seemed
inappropriate to Shang Yang who argued that decisions had to be made in accordance
with contemprary requirements instead of old traditions. Society needed control;
therefore he divided the population into units of ten and five households each.
All group members were mutually responsible. This census was the basis for individual
taxation: Every man aged 16 was registered as an adult tax payer, for labor
services, and military service. Hereditary ranks and titles were abolished,
new ranks and promotions were conferred only according to performance.
Han Feizi (280 - 234 BCE)
- was a descendant from the ruling house of the state of Han. He was a disciple
of Xunzi but criticized the Confucianists for their veneration of the traditions
af antiquity because he considered them as outdated. A strong
state had to rely on a functioning administration, controlled by law abiding
officials.
Social justice and peace had to be achieved by this reliable administration,
without the active control by the ruler who should live in seclusion. Yet in
fact the ruler was involved in active governing by promoting and demoting his
officials, through his control of his ministers, when distributing emoluments,
and when assigning payments for specified tasks. As his teacher Xunzi, Master
Han Fei was convinced that man's innate nature was bad. Laws and regulations
for punishments were considered essential instruments for the ruler to govern
his subjects. Agriculture was seen as the basis of the state because the welfare
of the people depended on agricultural products. Education should be functional;
overly refined minds were prone to abuse their knowledge and deceive and betray
others.
Agriculturalists:
Xu Xing (390? - 315? BCE)
Yin Yang School:
Zou Yan (ca. 305 - 240 BCE)