Minerals play a significant role in processes ranging in scale from
the formation and evolution of planets down to the interaction of living
organisms, rocks, fluids and even toxic chemicals at microscopic and submicroscopic
levels. Minerals have clearly played an important role in the origin and
evolution of life on planet Earth. In addition, the history of human
civilization has been significantly controlled by the properties, availability
and values placed on various minerals, together with technological advances
in processing and utilizing minerals and their derivative products. Minerals
have been a source of fascination and curiosity for humans since pre-historic
times. From the earliest of natural philosophers, including Aristotle,
minerals have impressed people from diverse cultures, backgrounds and interests
with their beauty, symmetry, properties, technological promises, and even
spiritual powers. Many of the challenges we, as a civilization, currently
face, and must confront, directly or indirectly involve minerals. These
challenges include controversal topics such as the ever-decreasing supply
of mineral resources, exploitation of mineral resources, utilization of
special properties of certain minerals in high-tech applications (e.g.,
quartz), environmental consequences of the mining, refining and production
of mineral-based products, and the environmental health hazards of some
important minerals and mineral dust (e.g., asbestos). An understanding
of the fundamentals of mineralogy is crucial in understanding these and
other contemporary problems in the earth, life and materials sciences.
Definition of a Mineral:
Mineral Group |
|
Native Elements | C, Au, Cu, Fe |
Oxides | MgO, Fe3O4, H2O |
Sulfides | FeS2, PbS, CuFeS2 |
Hydroxides | Mg(OH)2 |
Carbonates | CaCO3, FeCO3 |
Silicates | Mg2SiO4, KAlSi3O8, Ca2Mg5Si8O22(OH)2 |
Sulfates | BaSO4 |
2. Ionic Bond: Another way for an atom to achieve a completely filled outer shell of electrons is for it to lose or gain a sufficient number of electrons. An ionic bond is one in which there has been a complete transfer of electrons from the atom of one element to the atom of the other element. The ions so formed are held together by the electrostatic attraction between oppositely charged particles. e.g., Na+ and Cl- in the mineral halite. Bonding in most of the minerals we geologists deal with is largely ionic, however, covalent bonding does occur to a lesser degree.
3. Metallic Bond: This type of chemical bond is characteristic of native metals. Metals are elements whose atoms easily lose their outer electrons. In a typical metal there are more bond sites, or empty orbitals, than there are electron pairs to fill them. Detached electrons are dispersed among the atoms in the structure and are free to move about. This electron mobility, of course, is responsible for the good electrical conductivity of metals. Metallic bonding is found in native metals and to a lesser degree in some sulfides and arsenides.
4. Van der Waals Bond: The extremely weak bonds that arise from slight imbalence of charge between two atoms or groups of atoms which otherwise have electrical neutrality. Van der Waals bonds do not play an important role in minerals, although some minerals exhibit small degrees of van der Waals character.
These four types of bonds provide a convenient basis for the classification of crystal structures. It must be realized that although each type has well-defined properties, the classification is arbitrary because bonding in most minerals is more or less intermediate in character. For example, the Si-O bonds in silica and in the silicate minerals are neither purely ionic nor purely covalent, but are intermediate in character. Such intermediate bonds are typically called Polar Covalent Bonds. In this type of intermediate bond, although the electron pair occupies orbitals in both atoms, it spends more time in one of them (the one with the higher electronegativity). The directional character of these bonds also tends to be preserved. The gradational/transitional nature of common bonds is illustrated in the diagram to the right.
The nature and the relative strengths of crystal bonds are inseparable
from implications regarding the relative sizes and distances of mutual
separation of bonded atoms. It is therefore necessary to consider the sizes
of ions. The most stable configuration of of bonded ions is achieved when
oppositely charged ions (e.g., Na+ and Cl-) are as close together as possible
without overlapping.
A. Silicon has 4 electrons in its outer energy-level
shell (M). Each of the 4 elactrons is shared with one Oxygen, and
each oxygen in turn shares one oxygen with silicon.
B. Tetrahedral-shaped silicate molecule with oxygens
touching each other in natural positions. Silicon occupies the central
void between the 4 oxygens.
C. Expanded view of the molecule showing the oxygens
at the corners of the tetrahedron with bonds to the silicon at the center
of the tetrahedron.
NB. The bonding of 4 oxygens and 1 silicon does not acheive charge neutrality. The molecule, in fact, has a net charge of -4. The fundamental building block of the silicate minerals is therefore [SiO4]-4.
Different groups of silicate minerals arise from the several ways in which the [SiO4]-4 tetrahedra can be linked together to form silicate crystal structures. As an example, the olivine group of minerals is formed by bonding isolated [SiO4]-4 tetrahedra to two divalent cations such as Mg2+ or Fe2+ . This achieves both charge balance and results in a three-dimensional array of isolated [SiO4]-4 tetrahedra linked by the metal cations.
Another way in which [SiO4]-4 tetrahedra can be linked together is for the tetrahedra to share some or all of their corner oxygens with adjacent tetrahedra. This is an example of the process known as polymerization. For example, the mineral group pyroxene, consists of [SiO4]-4 tetrahedra linked together to form single chains. In this structure, each tetrahedron shares two of its 4 oxygens with adjacent tetrahedra. Consequently, the building block formula is [SiO3]-2 . These single chains can then be linked together by bonding with one divalent cation such as Mg2+ or Fe2+ , to yield the formula (Mg, Fe) SiO3 .
The main groups of silicate minerals that result from polymerization of [SiO4]-4 tetrahedra are shown in the following figure/table:
The three-dimensional framework minerals are especially important as minerals in this structural group are the most abundant minerals in the continental crust. Quartz is the simplest of this group; it results from sharing of all four of the corner oxygens, resulting in a formula of SiO2 with no need for additional cations to balance charge.
The feldspars arise by substituting Al3+ for Si4+ in some of the tetrahedra. If, for example, we substitute one Al in every four tetrahedra, we obtain a molecule of [AlSi3O8]-1. The charge on this molecule can be balanced by bonding with monovalent cations such as Na+ or K+ . This produces minerals such as alkali feldspar, KAlSi3O8 or NaAlSi3O8 .
We do not expect you to become expert mineralogists from this course,
but do hope that this series of lectures has provided you with a better
understanding of the basic structures, and the ways in which crystal structure
plays an important role in determining many of the physical properties
displayed by minerals. These include properties such as cleavage,
hardness, habit, symmetry, color and many more.