|   In the nineteenth century, child-caring 
              institutions such as orphanages and infant asylums proliferated. 
              By 1900, the ideology of institutional care was in decline. A new 
              imperative to place children in families was signaled by the first 
              White House Conference on Children in 1909, which championed home 
              life as “the highest and finest product of civilization.” 
              It was not until the 1950s, however, that the number of children 
              living in temporary foster families exceeded the number of children 
              living in institutions, and it was not until the 1960s that the 
              number of adoptive placements surpassed the number of institutional 
              placements. 
            Early in the twentieth century, “placing-out” was the 
              term that designated all non-institutional arrangements to care 
              for dependent children. Placing-out could mean baby 
              farming. It could mean boarding homes, in which agencies paid 
              families to care for children, or working homes, where older children 
              earned their keep. Traditional indentures were still used by orphanages 
              in many states into the twentieth century and these were not unusual 
              as a means of acquiring children for adoption. Indenture contracts 
              secured childrens services for a period of years in exchange 
              for the provision of food, shelter, and basic education. At their 
              age of release, typically 18, indentured children were given a fixed 
              sum of money, a suit of clothing, or other material resources specified 
              in advance. Free homes, where children received care without monetary 
              compensation, was another placing-out method. Free homes approximated 
              an adoption ideal founded on love rather than labor. Many children 
              placed in free homes were never legally adopted, however, and in 
              the early decades of the century, they were much less common than 
              homes in which board was paid.  
            Many Progressive-era reformers were influenced by eugenics 
              and insisted on a policy of family preservation. They grudgingly 
              accepted placing-out—especially when it amounted to adoption—as 
              a last resort. They may have idealized families as the only acceptable 
              place for children, but they preferred above all to keep children 
              with their blood kin. 
             |