|   A total of 395 Indian children 
              have been placed for adoption through the Indian Adoption Project 
              as of December 31, 1967. One hundred nineteen of the children were 
              placed in 1967, compared with 67 in 1966 and 49 in 1965. Of all 
              the children placed, one child died prior to adoption, and two children 
              had to be returned to their home state because the placement failed. . . . 
            Major Accomplishments of the Project 
             One can no longer say the the Indian child is the “forgotten 
              child,” as was indicated when the Project began in 1958. As 
              already reported, resources for the adoption of Indian children 
              have been developed in 26 states and on territory of the United 
              States. The adoption needs of Indian children have been well publicized 
              through a variety of national media, and over the years the League 
              has referred well over 5,000 prospective adoptive families for Indian 
              children to agencies in every state in the Union. The Indian child’s 
              reception in the East has been primarily one of “sentiment 
              for our first Americans.” The prejudice which prevented his 
              adoption in his own state has greatly decreased, due mainly to the 
              receptivity of families in other states to adopt him. This reaction 
              has caused social agencies in the child’s home state to take 
              a “new look” at the Indian child’s adoptability 
              with the result that many more Indian children are being placed 
              for adoption in their own state. . . . 
            Major Problems of the Project 
             1. Adoption services for families wanting to adopt Indian children 
              are not available in all states. This lack of service usually extends 
              to families wishing to adopt any out-of-state child, including the 
              foreign child. The rationale, as stated by social agencies, is that 
              their first obligation is to serve children who are residents of 
              the state. As a direct result of this, in one area these families 
              organized themselves into an adoptive parent group for minority 
              children. This resulted in more adoption service and three families 
              have now adopted Indian children. 
             2. Many more children could have been placed for adoption in 1967 
              had they been on referral to our Project. All year the Project has 
              had from 50 to 65 approved adoptive families on referral, with far 
              fewer children referred. There are still many Indian children needing 
              adoption who have not been referred to our Project. The Bureau of 
              Indian Affairs and state departments of welfare need to have frequent 
              periodic reviews of Indian children in foster care to make sure 
              that those children who, in essence, are without parents receive 
              services to make them eligible for adoption. 
             |