|   The orphan trains are among the 
              most famous episodes in adoption history. Between 1854 and 1929, 
              as many as 250,000 children from New York and other Eastern cities 
              were sent by train to towns in midwestern and western states, as 
              well as Canada and Mexico. Families interested in the orphans showed 
              up to look them over when they were placed on display in local train 
              stations, and placements were frequently made with little or no 
              investigation or oversight. 
            This ambitious and controversial project in the relocation of a 
              massive child population was emblematic of the move toward placing-out. 
              Organized by the New York Childrens Aid Society and directed 
              by well known reformer Charles Loring 
              Brace, the orphan trains were based on the theory that the innocent 
              children of poor Catholic and Jewish immigrants could be rescued 
              and Americanized if they were permanently removed from depraved 
              urban surroundings and placed with upstanding Anglo-Protestant farming 
              families. This evangelical humanitarianism echoed more than a century 
              later, after World War II, when people like Bertha 
              and Harry Holt made international 
              adoptions more visible and common. 
            In spite of the trains' stated intention, they did not permanently 
              separate most children, geographically or culturally, from their 
              parents and communities of origin. Well into the twentieth century, 
              impoverished but resourceful parents took advantage of the services 
              of middle-class child-savers for their own purposes, including temporary 
              caretaking during periods of economic crisis and apprenticeships 
              that helped children enter the labor market. Reformers like Brace 
              were determined to salvage the civic potential of poor immigrant 
              children by placing them in culturally “worthy” families 
              while simultaneously reducing urban poverty and crime and supplying 
              some of the workers that western development required. But poor 
              parents had no intention of losing track of their children, and 
              they usually did not, even in the case of very young children placed 
              permanently for “adoption.” Historians who have studied 
              the records of the Childrens Aid Society closely have concluded 
              that the largest number of orphan train children were temporarily 
              transferred or shared, not given up. 
             |