|   Pre-placement 
              inquiry 
             Purpose of Inquiry.—There are several reasons 
              why the investigation of the child’s history must be thorough. 
              We need complete knowledge of the child’s circumstances and 
              personality to place him successfully. Moreover, we need it to inform 
              foster parents, who more and more frequently are demanding full 
              and detailed histories for the children whom they think of adopting. 
              For the child himself, when he is grown, we must have the facts 
              about his own family. If he knows that he is an adopted child, as 
              most adopted children do nowadays, he will have a natural curiosity, 
              which he has a right to satisfy, about his parentage. Last of all, 
              but of increasing importance, is the interest of science, both social 
              and psychological, in these records, so rich in human significance 
              and in facts which need only to be assembled to have genuine scientific 
              value. Scientific research may seem a remote affair to the harassed 
              case worker, but her records may some day contribute invaluable 
              material to the scientific student, and it is to research that we 
              owe many of the methods which we daily use—the intelligence 
              test, the Wassermann test, and the complete physical examination. . . . 
            Legal status.—How did the agency secure 
              the custody of the child? By poor law commitment, by court commitment, 
              by abandonment by the parents? 
            Family History.—This involves gathering 
              every scrap of significant information about his family, including 
              his grandparents, aunts and uncles; their health, intelligence, 
              schooling, occupations, habits, character, religion. Where and how 
              have they lived? Why did they move? What did the neighbors think 
              of them? Were they “queer”? What was their reputation 
              in the community? What did they look like? Could they hold jobs? 
              What kind? Did they keep a clean house? Were they quarrelsome? How 
              did they treat the children? Have they records in a police office 
              or in a social service office? 
            Personal History.—How old was the child 
              when conditions in his home became bad? How old when he was removed? 
              Where has he lived since—in boarding homes or institutions 
              or in visiting homes? How long in each? How long has he been in 
              school? His grade? His school record? His personal appearance, coloring, 
              etc.? 
            Health.—Was he breast fed? When did he begin 
              to walk and talk? What illnesses has he had? What kind of feeding, 
              cleanliness, hygiene has he had? A thorough examination of his present 
              condition will usually include a Wasserman test, and in the case 
              of girls smears are made, whenever possible, for determination of 
              possible venereal infection. 
            Intelligence.—The child’s intelligence 
              is usually tested by a psychologist, using one of the standard tests. 
              Children whose parents or relatives show a marked degree of mental 
              inferiority should always be tested, and also children who show 
              serious retardation. The results of the test, taken with the observation 
              of people who see the child constantly, give some indication of 
              the child’s mental capacity and help to determine whether 
              he should be placed with a family who will be ambitious for his 
              progress in an educational way, or with a family whose work and 
              interests are of a simpler sort. 
            Personality.—Information about the child’s 
              personality is as important as any of the more tangible facts which 
              we need. It is possible to have on record a full statement of the 
              child’s background, his physique, and the circumstances of 
              his removal from his own home, and yet to know nothing of the child 
              himself. When it comes to the test, that of setting a frightened, 
              neglected child in the midst of strangers, such knowledge may prove 
              futile. What we really need to know is what the child feels about 
              his own father and mother, about his separation from them, what 
              memories he has brought with him, and what he hopes and fears from 
              a new home. If a little girl has been brutally treated by her drunken 
              father, will she be terrified by her new father? Often such memories 
              lie buried in the child’s mind, unknown to the foster parent 
              or to the visitor, causing him worry and fear and making it nearly 
              impossible to trust the strangers with whom he is living. Such a 
              child can be hardly anything but unresponsive, disobedient, or dishonest. 
            In addition to knowing the child’s feeling about his situation 
              we need to know his tastes, the things that he enjoys doing, his 
              temper, his demonstrativeness, his honesty, his ability to get on 
              with other children. If he is a robust, boisterous child, strong 
              willed and aggressive, he will never get on with the Browns, who 
              want a sensitive, responsive child, but he may just suit the Greens, 
              who don’t on any account want a “sissy.” It is 
              vital to know these things in advance so that one may choose the 
              right home for him.  
              |