FACILITY AUDIT: EVALUATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS |
©2006
Fred Tepfer
1380 Bailey Avenue Eugene, OR 97402 non-commercial use freely granted |
return to Fred
Tepfer's home page |
You have all seen statements by school officials to the effect of "it would
take $10 million to bring it up to code). How do you really evaluate existing
buildings? What is the tangible value?
Existing buildings should be evaluated on their own merits, not measured against
the moving target of current code compliance. Unless almost brand new, no public
building meets current code. This is because the major codes (building, plumbing,
electrical, mechanical) are changed every three years, and are almost always
made more stringent. Nearly all codes only apply when construction occurs, and,
with a few exceptions, only apply to areas affected by construction. The notable
exception is the fire code, which is retroactive in many cases.
I prefer an approach that focusses both on building systems as well as educational and community issues. Is it a good space for learning? Is there strong support in the community for it?
I like to expand on the concepts of building layers proposed in Stewart Brand's
How Buildings Learn (Penguin, 1994) to create a framework for evaluating
existing buildings. This helps keep the focus on human needs equally with building
systems. For more on this subject, read Building
Systems: an Introduction.
Here is a summary of concepts from the list:
People issues ("stuff" and "space plan" in Brand's diagram):
Program (room shape, flexibility, functionality, imprintability, personalization,
scale, etc.)
Physical comfort issues (heat, cool, ventilation, sound, daylight, etc.)
Experiential issues (views/texture/form/color/beauty)
Site: Playing fields, outdoor teaching, landscape |
Services (or systems):Plumbing, heating/cooling/ventilation, electrical systems, phone & data systems, intercom systems, fire safety/alarms/suppression, security |
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
Questions to ask:
Could a different use be found for disfunctional space which would not require
remodeling, or which would require less remodeling?
Could you add to the building to make the whole facility work programmatically,
instead of remodeling the existing space?
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
- acoustics within teaching spaces (too much echo? too muted?)
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
- access to views and daylight in all permanently occupied space
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
- colors that seem pleasant, not dated, not trendy
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
- variety of textures and materials that convey the intended character and spirit
of the place
(such as informal, or institutional, or professional, or friendly)
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
Terrain - Are there accessibility issues for people with disability?
- Geologic hazard issue?s (slides, erosion)
- Maintenance issues? (lawns too steep to mow)
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
Drainage - Is there standing water at times other than major storms?
Are there large muddy areas? If there is a crawlspace, is there water in the
crawl space? If so, is this a new problem?
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
Other site issues:
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
Superstructure (wall, floor, roof structure) - Are there visible sags, cracks?
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
Lateral loads (seismic, wind)
FEMA Rapid Visual Survey methods, available from the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, provides a simple method for non-professionals to identify possibly
risky buildings. Nearly all public buildings built in western Oregon and Washington
before 1991 may need some seismic retrofit and should be surveyed.
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
Rot/Corrosion - Does a careful examination of all surfaces/spaces (including
crawlspaces and attics) reveal corrosion or rot problems? How extensive are
the problems?
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
Other structural
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
anticipated const. cost: $________ to $________
Are there exits from each end of every corridor longer than 20 feet?
Are there two exits in all classrooms larger than 999 square feet?
Are there fire sprinklers?
Are there fire alarms? Do they detect smoke? Heat? In each room?
Are there fire extinguishers in each room? Maintained annually?
Are there fire hydrants within 400' of each side of the building?
- Are pre-school play areas fenced and gated?
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
- Is there a clear view of approaches and of play areas from the office or other
area that is normally staffed?
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
- Are there sidewalks from the building entrance to the city street system?
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
-Does the parking lot separate bus and car loading
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
- Are there protected walkways from the car parking and bus loading areas to
the school?
anticipated const.
cost: $________ to $________
|
::::::::::::return to Fred Tepfer's home page:::::::: return to School Facilities Reading:::::::::::::::