Open Letter from F. Regina Psaki to President
Frohnmayer
The following email was received 26 November 2000.
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:50:33 -0800
From: Regina Psaki
rpsaki@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU
Subject: FYI; letter to Pres. Frohnmayer
X-Sender: rpsaki@oregon.uoregon.edu
To: "oregon::jwearl"@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU, gilkey@darkwing.uoregon.edu
Cc: "oregon::marcovan"@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU, tedards@darkwing.uoregon.edu
26 January 2000
Dear President Frohnmayer,
Many of the issues that faculty colleagues have highlighted in recent
communications have struck a nerve with me; Richard Sundt, Frank Stahl, and
Linda Kintz among others have articulated concerns that I care about
deeply. I write now to present a slightly different take on the question of
faculty compensation.
One reason that the issue of faculty compensation and the university's
true priorities have become hot buttons is the accelerating erosion of the
quality of the faculty's working lives over the past 10 years. For a very
long time the UO has relied on the Oregon "quality of life dividend" to
offset faculty salaries, but that quality of life has now been eroded by
many factors, among them the following:
- -- the practice of withholding, freezing and cutting replacement lines.
Fewer faculty do the work that used to be shared among a larger team.
- -- the demonstrable increase of faculty responsiblity in such areas as
recruitment, retention, advising, P.R. (electronic and in-person).
- -- the exponential increase of administrative responsibilities that comes
after tenure.
- -- the de facto – soon to be de jure – competition among academic units for
enrollments, for lines, and (most distressingly) for simple respect from
the administration.
- -- the competition within academic units for salary increases, and the
ratcheting-up of expectations for research "productivity" (and hence
promotion, tenure, and merit increases), despite a simultaneous reduction
in the amount of time and support available to enable research.
I came to the UO in 1989, canceling campus interviews at Emory,
Utah and Loyola, for the quality of life dividend. Frankly I don't see my
current quality of life as sufficiently high to offset my salary, but I remain
more concerned about quality of life than about salary. The deep morale problem
I see on this campus is unlikely to be solved by even the most improbably
munificent raises.
Very truly yours,
F. Regina Psaki
Associate Professor, Romance Languages
Web page spun on 264 January 2000 by
Peter
B Gilkey 202 Deady Hall,
Department of Mathematics
at the
University of Oregon, Eugene OR 97403-1222, U.S.A.
Phone 1-541-346-4717
Email:peter.gilkey.cc.67@aya.yale.edu
of
Deady Spider Enterprises