Letter from the UO Senate Executive Committee to University President Frohmayer
The Senate Executive Committee would like to thank you for taking an hour
and a half of your time on Friday the 14th to listen to our concerns, and
to talk about faculty issues. This letter is to record our impressions
of that meeting as the basis for further conversations and to discuss the
three ideas of a more or less practical nature that we raised.
-
First, we believe that the relation of the faculty and the administration
must not be antagonistic--cannot be, in fact, any more than the
right arm can fight the left. We are two members of the same body. This
analogy suggests that faculty do not generally think of themselves as employees
of the administration; traditionally they are the living body of the University,
largely self-governing, in partnership with their administration. It may
be that as the University has evolved in the last decade toward the new
corporate business model, that traditional relationship has become obscured.
Perhaps in your current round of meetings with various units, you could
invite a senator from the unit you are visiting to participate in some
way. That would increase genuine dialogue in the meetings and lessen the
impression that the faculty and the administration are opposed parties.
-
Second, we are concerned that since the Provost's duties have, of necessity,
evolved more and more toward budget management, no one is now providing
the articulation and implementation of the University's academic vision.
(This vision should not be confused with budget priorities, nor with public
relations, fund-raising or marketing campaigns aimed at the outside world,
nor with new technology, nor with the brainstorming of the Process for
Change.) Exactly how to address this concern is an open question, but you
should at least be alert to the problem as faculty see it.
-
Third, in the Town Hall Meeting and other venues for faculty/administration
dialogue, we encourage you to listen to the full range of faculty concerns,
no matter how uncomfortable that may be. We do not see the administration's
job as to ``contain" the issues that affect faculty morale; rather, these
should be invited into the open so they can be discussed, understood and
addressed cooperatively. It is not necessary to defend the administration
against every question or complaint; but it is necessary to listen to it,
in order to understand the shape of the problem.
In general, our meeting Friday suggested that while salary and budget issues
are of enormous importance right now, they are symptoms of a deeper institutional
malaise, not only local but nationwide. We urge you to invite discussion
of the deeper issues, even as we move to repair the damage in salaries.
The Senate Executive Committee
Web page spun on 24 January 2000 by
Peter
B Gilkey 202 Deady Hall, Department of Mathematics
at the
University of Oregon,
Eugene OR 97403-1222, U.S.A. Phone 1-541-346-4717 Email:peter.gilkey.cc.67@aya.yale.edu
of
Deady Spider Enterprises