



This structure consists of clearly defined solid and void. The entrance is marked by a vertical planar element about which the building is symmetrically oriented. From this vertical element comes a horizontal element- a bridge- which leads one through t he two central columns and into the center of the house. The center of this house is void. The overall shape suggests a traditional box form split open at the corner with this bridge taking us right into the middle of it. The flat walls that define the sides morph into symmetrical curvilinear walls at the upper level. They turn towards each other but stop short of meeting. They appear to be floating in the photos.
The plan is based on a square with two central columns placed about one third of the way towards the center from the corner along a line connecting two opposite corners. These two columns form the end points (and end supports) for the rectangular shaped bridge which defines the entrance. This rectangle is therefore at forty five degrees to the natrual axis of the square.
The exterior facade of brick and masonry block is probably not the load-bearing structure whereas the concrete floors are the surfaces of the floor system. The exterior facade consists of horizontal strips which consist of a double layer of gray masonry and a single later of white brick.
The curved wall portion which cantilevers over the upper deck is clearly a use of masonry in a way that denies its inherent structure. It is used as wall surface while the underlying structure is concrete and steel. While we may not agree with his use o
f masonry as decoration, this curved element is an evocative piece of this building.
The connection where the floor meets the wall may be described as a pin connection (assuming the construction details are as I have described). The steel of the floor is tied into the steel of the wall, but most likely, it is not a welded connection. Th
e floor may have I-beams which rest on the masonry blocks. The concrete within the wall and the concrete floor are poured at different times and are therefore, exxentially, separate systems. Therefore, I do not think that this is a moment connection. T
his system will allow for some lateral movement to occur without breaking.
Lateral Loads
This building resists lateral loads by the combination of diaphrams on the two perpendicular back walls in conjunction with diaphrams inherent in the floor slabs. Thenecessary triangulation seen in timber frame structures, for example, is not necessary h
ere because tringulation is complete within the slabs. This structure achieves the strength of a concrete slab cube with almost no structure on the two entrance walls. In addition to acting as diaphrams, the floors also resist buckling in the columns by
decreasing the effective buckling length.
Ambrose Poh and Michael Zaretsky
ARCH 461/561 Spring 1995
Do you have questions about adding a case? or a building to suggest??????? send a message to me....... chrisl@aaa.uoregon.edu